Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added protection for zero pt ghost candidates #9831

Merged

Conversation

davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

also in 741patchX cycle

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 (David Lange) for CMSSW_7_4_1_patchX.

added protection for zero pt ghost candidates

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/JetMCAlgos

@cmsbuild, @vadler, @monttj can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ferencek, @acaudron, @pvmulder, @imarches this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.

Note that this branch is designed for requested bug fixes specific to the CMSSW_7_4_1 release.
If you wish to make a pull request for the CMSSW_7_4_X release cycle, please use the CMSSW_7_4_X branch instead

@monttj
Copy link
Contributor

monttj commented Jun 23, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_1_patchX IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW or unless it breaks tests.

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2015
added protection for zero pt ghost candidates
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 0a7e48d into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_4_1_patchX Jun 23, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants