Btag DQM: move from binomial error to ClopperPearson error for Efficiency

[acaudron]

• Change the way to assign error on Efficiency: binomial -> ClopperPearson as should give better error estimation for low efficiency cases.
• Take the opportunity to add missing Efficiency Flag for efficiency plots.

Actually the same as #9863.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @acaudron for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Btag DQM: move from binomial error to ClopperPearson error for Efficiency

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/RecoB

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ferencek, @acaudron, @rociovilar, @pvmulder, @imarches this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9864/48/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[swertz]

Dear @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar : what is the status of this PR from your side?

[davidlange6]

+1