Updated HLTTau validation to include legs X in tau+X triggers

[slehti]

This update adds legs X from tau+X trigger into validation. This is continuing PR #9533, which I could not modify due to missing release top.
The last comment of PR #9533 is now fixed, changed getByLabel -> getByToken. PR #9533 can now be dropped.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @slehti for CMSSW_7_6_X.

Updated HLTTau validation to include legs X in tau+X triggers

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/Trigger
HLTriggerOffline/Tau

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rociovilar, @trocino, @jhgoh, @battibass this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 286fac0
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9928/10970/summary.html

[davidlange6]

+1

[perrotta]

Since data taking (and corresponding validation) is actually done with 74X, does it exist (or do you foresee) a 74X counterpart of this pull request?

[slehti]

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, perrotta wrote:

Since data taking (and corresponding validation) is actually done with 74X, does it exist (or do you foresee) a 74X counterpart of this pull request?
Yes. The code compiles and runs also in 74X, and we'd like it to be
included in 74X as well. How do I proceed?

Cheers,
Sami

[perrotta]

Just submit the same pull request to 74X !

[davidlange6]

looks like this is causing problems a number of workflows eg, 1311. Backing out for now.

[mbluj]

Dear David,
what exact problems is it causing? Do you expect any action from developers of the code (Sami & Co.)?

[deguio]

to reproduce the problems in a 76 release you can do
runTheMatrix.py -l 1311

[slehti]

Problem found and fixed. As this PR is closed, do I have to make a new one, or can this be opened again?

[deguio]

ciao @slehti
you can push to the same branch and re-open this PR.
thanks,
F.

[deguio]

ok, I see that a new one was submitted. forget my comment then.
F.