Skip to content

dantebronto/consensus

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

71 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

About

The consensus project is intended to assist in the operation of worker cooperatives. In a worker’s cooperative, employees act in a hybrid capacity as worker, owner, and manager. Read about what makes a cooperative a “worker cooperative” here.

Benefits of such a working arrangement include:

  • Democratic control – Everyone has a voice in operating procedures.
  • Self ownership – Workers take pride and initiative.
  • Fair remuneration – Payment based is more on actual effort or contribution.
  • Efficiency – No more exorbitant expenditure on a potentially ineffective management layer. You don’t need someone to crack the whip when people are self motivated.
  • Professional improvement – It is in the best interest of a coop to employ workers who can “wear many hats” (balanced job complexes).

The main trade-off with this mode of organization is time. Workers will undoubtedly spend more time in an administrative capacity as opposed to a specific, potentially rote, task.

The transition to a democratic workplace can be difficult. After spending extensive time in our deeply hierarchical modern workplace can one experience difficulty in attempting self reliance. This software attempts bring assistance to two main areas of difficulty.

  1. Decision making – Consensus provides a polling suite allowing for several vote types: single option, multi-option, prioritization and allocation. Organizations can hold internal votes on policy, and almost instantly see transparent results.
  2. Profit sharing – Workers who act as owners need to be concerned with payment. In combination with the voting tools, Consensus allows you to determine employee / partner payouts based on dimensions like tenure, hours worked, and capital contributions. You can even choose to include subjective metrics of contribution via a peer review tool.

This video explains the profit sharing model (around 23:00)

The video has the production value of a 80s educational video, but it shows a really complete idea of what this software is about.

Installation

git clone git@github.com:dantebronto/consensus.git
cd consensus
cp config/database.example.yml config/database.yml
sudo rake gems:install
rake db:schema:load
rake setup:admin
script/server

Usage

Once the server is running, you can login as the user admin created above. Click the user admin link in the header and proceed to create a user account for everyone in your organization. Then you should be able to “view active votes” to begin setting up votes. Consensus currently has four vote types:

  • Single option – The voter is asked to choose one of many created options (via radio buttons).
  • Multi-option – The voter is asked to select any number of preferred options (via checkboxes).
  • Prioritization – The voter is asked to drag and drop a list of options in order of preference. Once everyone in the organization does the same, the result will be a global preference list from most to least desired options.
  • Allocation – The voter is asked to drag a group of linked sliders (always equaling 100%) to allocate a quantity of something across the various options.

These votes can be created and decided upon in near real time (in a meeting setting) to help determine the best course of action for your organization.


An allocation vote


Graph of a vote result

The other component of Consensus deals with the payment of worker-members. By clicking the “pay out” link at the top, one is able to create a payment record, or remuneration, for a desired pay period. This works just like an allocation vote, where your organization can decide how much money to spend in each area. The default areas are as follow:

  • Tenure – Workers can be rewarded based on how long they have been with the organization. This is a good way for those who were involved “at the ground level” to maintain ownership.
  • Peer review – A prioritization vote can be held each pay period to determine subjective worker contribution.
  • Hours – Workers can enter their hours worked for a given pay period.
  • Worker misc – Miscellaneous worker contributions. Setup to work like a allocation vote.
  • Worker capital – Decide how much or how quickly to repay workers based on capital contributions to the organization.
  • Org misc – Miscellaneous organization funds. Set aside an amount to be used at a later time.
  • Org capital – The amount of money that comes out of profits that goes back into capitalizing your organization.

For all of these dimensions, it is up to your organization to determine how much emphasis to put on each category. For example, a young, fledgeling company might decide to put low emphasis on repaying capital contributed by workers, but put a higher emphasis on working longer hours. If a company is saving up for a new piece of equipment, they might temporarily decide to divert more funds into the organization’s capital reserves. The idea is that these dimensions can be changed in an agile fashion to adjust to the needs of your organization.

Once a remuneration record is created and the various dimensions are filled out, Consensus will calculate how much is owed to each worker-member based on the percentage of emphasis alloted by the members.


Remuneration, showing how much of the profits each worker is entitled to

If you’re interested in the project, feel free to contact me: klpresley@gmail.com

About

consensus cooperative management software

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published