Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove some more bwc code #8778

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 4, 2014

Conversation

javanna
Copy link
Member

@javanna javanna commented Dec 4, 2014

Some more code that was left for backwards compatibility can now be removed on master since 2.0 will require a full cluster restart.

@@ -449,39 +449,6 @@ public void testCommonTermsQueryStackedTokens() throws Exception {
}

@Test
public void testOmitTermFreqsAndPositions() throws Exception {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did you remove this? I think it's still valid?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, I was not 100% sure either... will restore

@s1monw
Copy link
Contributor

s1monw commented Dec 4, 2014

left one comment other than that LGTM

@javanna javanna force-pushed the enhancement/remove_bwc_leftovers branch from 689c8f4 to 9ae893a Compare December 4, 2014 13:06
Some more code that was left for backwards compatibility can now be removed on master since 2.0 will require a full cluster restart.

Closes elastic#8778
@javanna javanna force-pushed the enhancement/remove_bwc_leftovers branch from 9ae893a to 95c2d84 Compare December 4, 2014 13:08
@javanna javanna merged commit 95c2d84 into elastic:master Dec 4, 2014
@javanna javanna removed the review label Dec 4, 2014
@clintongormley clintongormley changed the title Internal: remove some more bwc code Remove some more bwc code Jun 6, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants