Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Made the nested, reverse_nested and children aggs ignore unmapped nested fields or unmapped child / parent types. #8808

Conversation

martijnvg
Copy link
Member

PR for #8760

@jpountz
Copy link
Contributor

jpountz commented Dec 10, 2014

LGTM. I'm wondering if this change should go to 1.4.2 or not (ie. do we consider it a bug fix or an enhancement)? Since the change in behaviour is quite significant, I would lean towards not backporting to 1.4.2?

@martijnvg
Copy link
Member Author

@jpountz Agreed, lets only make this change in 1.5 and master.

@martijnvg martijnvg force-pushed the nested_reverse_nested_children_aggs_unmapped branch from 5a3f398 to 61d237f Compare January 6, 2015 10:43
…ed nested fields or unmapped child / parent types.

Closes elastic#8760
@martijnvg martijnvg force-pushed the nested_reverse_nested_children_aggs_unmapped branch from 61d237f to ca68136 Compare January 6, 2015 11:14
@martijnvg martijnvg merged commit ca68136 into elastic:master Jan 6, 2015
@martijnvg martijnvg deleted the nested_reverse_nested_children_aggs_unmapped branch May 18, 2015 23:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants