Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Sorting: Nested filter with nested sorting doesn't use missing value. #3020

Closed
martijnvg opened this issue May 10, 2013 · 0 comments
Closed

Sorting: Nested filter with nested sorting doesn't use missing value. #3020

martijnvg opened this issue May 10, 2013 · 0 comments
Labels
>enhancement v0.90.1 v1.0.0.Beta1

Comments

@martijnvg
Copy link
Member

Reuse the missing support for fields (number based fields) inside nested object when nested_filter doesn't match a inner object.
martijnvg added a commit to martijnvg/elasticsearch that referenced this issue May 15, 2013
@martijnvg
If matching root doc's inner objects don't match the nested_filter …
1a2b0e6 
…then the `missing` value should be used to sort the root doc.

Closes elastic#3020
@martijnvg martijnvg mentioned this issue May 15, 2013
Closed
martijnvg added a commit that referenced this issue May 16, 2013
@martijnvg
If matching root doc's inner objects don't match the nested_filter …
ea5adce 
…then the `missing` value should be used to sort the root doc.

Closes #3020
mute pushed a commit to mute/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2015
@martijnvg
If matching root doc's inner objects don't match the nested_filter …
b147235 
…then the `missing` value should be used to sort the root doc.

Closes elastic#3020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
>enhancement v0.90.1 v1.0.0.Beta1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@martijnvg