Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename should_call to should_call_spy #91

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ollipa
Copy link
Member

@ollipa ollipa commented Oct 13, 2021

Closes #86

@ollipa ollipa self-assigned this Oct 13, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 13, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #91 (613d230) into master (d9fd8bd) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #91   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.05%   98.06%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         822      826    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits          806      810    +4     
  Misses         16       16           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/flexmock/_api.py 99.72% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d9fd8bd...613d230. Read the comment docs.

@ollipa ollipa mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@christophe-riolo christophe-riolo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had doubts about the name still (it's so long), but after thinking about it more I'm fine with it 👍

@ollipa
Copy link
Member Author

ollipa commented Oct 26, 2021

@adarshk7, what do you think?

@adarshk7
Copy link

Added my thoughts to comment on the original issue 😄

@ollipa
Copy link
Member Author

ollipa commented Oct 27, 2021

I think @adarshk7 made some good points. I'll close this PR and let's continue the discussion in #86 issue.

@ollipa ollipa closed this Oct 27, 2021
@ollipa ollipa deleted the task/86-rename-should-call branch January 12, 2022 01:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rename Expectation.should_call method to something more descriptive
4 participants