New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add JWST photometry correction #107
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
More complete numbers are now available in CRDS in jwst_0989.pmap. Here is an updated table of my multiplicative corrections to 0942 compared to the new values.
|
If you use these numbers or want to refer to this discussion, please cite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7143382. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As of late August 2022, a number of groups have found that there still seem to be large corrections to the individual NIRCam SCA photometric calibration required, even after the CRDS updates in late July. There is a series of ongoing calibration programs that will establish the absolute calibration of all of the modes at high precision. For now, however, those calibration data are incomplete.
I have derived some corrections to the
jwst_0942.pmap
context using the following:J1743045
suggests that the absolute NIRISS calibration is quite good, with just a correction of 1/1.04 required for F200WThe tabulated values in
grizli/data/photom_correction.yml
are the median ratios of the derived flux densities in the indicated filters to some reference, either relative or absolute. To apply the corrections relative to exposures calibrated with the current CRDS_CONTEXT, the values should be divided from the SCI and ERR arrays, which is now implemented inutils.drizzle_from_visit
.The LMC mosaics are available at https://s3.amazonaws.com/grizli-v2/JwstMosaics/lmc-astrometric-field/lmc.html. The full notebook used to derive the LMC corrections is at https://s3.amazonaws.com/grizli-v2/JwstMosaics/lmc-astrometric-field/astrometric-field-photometry.ipynb.
The figures below show the distribution of flux ratios in the NIRCam LW and SW filters, where the median values are stored in the correction table.
Module ratios for NIRCam LW
NIRCam SW ratios relative to NIRISS
The multiplicative corrections are summarized below: