New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Work in progress: 0.18 release notes #2769
Conversation
Isn't it worth noting that nodes have been replaced by pages? As far as I know the changes you made are backwards compatible. But certain things might be handled differently by theme maintainers if they are aware of this change. I glimpsed over the last commits and didn't found this pull requests on the list:
|
Yes that is the main feature -- but I added that to the release notes when I added the feature (fresh memory), so they do not show up on this diff. I browsed through the commit log, but I obviously missed something. I have checked the "allow edits from other maintainers" -- couldn't you just update the file (with the new items you found + formatting + editing, if you have time ...)? We have a week++ until release so no rush. |
Sure, I'll add them. I'm not in hurry but just wanted to highlight the additions rather sooner than later 😉 |
I notice that some of the "fixes" is really "improvements", but we will fix that, eventually. |
@@ -42,25 +46,32 @@ Not only is this a much simpler model to understand, it is also faster and paved | |||
|
|||
## Other New Features | |||
|
|||
* Every `Page` now has a `Kind` property. Since everything is a `Page` now, the `Kind` is used to differentiate different kinds of pages. | |||
Possible values are `page`, `home`, `section`, `taxonomy`, `taxonomyTerm`, `RSS`, `sitemap`, `robotsTXT`, and `404`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is true, but it may confuse some users. I deliberately kept all from RSS and right unexported, because they are only of internal interest (for now) -- these pages does not show up in any of the page collections and as such these kinds cannot be used for anything practical for end users. So I suggest just mentioning those in parens or something)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll tweak it shortly. Thanks
We should add some lines about the performance:
I have run the numbers twice, and the error margin seems to be just a couple of percent on my MacBook, so this is impressive. This is https://github.com/bep/hugo-benchmark Maybe add one line in the same breath about the |
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
@moorereason @digitalcraftsman @spf13 @anthonyfok and others ... this is just a rough outline. Please edit / add.