Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
[8949] Implement proper support spell auras with maxstack > 1 and cha…
…rges > 0. * Like auras expected to be proccessed in spell proc event code (not lost charge at use in spellmods code). Exist examples for like spells that affect value in spellmods but have different expire requirements. * Propertly work with stacked auras in spell proc event code - remove only one auras from stack - in case charges exist in same time not touch charges but return expire (all really used auars with maxstack>1 and charges have 1 in one from this values)
- Loading branch information
VladimirMangos
committed
Dec 8, 2009
1 parent
4a6ab54
commit 4135b24
Showing
4 changed files
with
58 additions
and
47 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | ||
#ifndef __REVISION_NR_H__ | ||
#define __REVISION_NR_H__ | ||
#define REVISION_NR "8948" | ||
#define REVISION_NR "8949" | ||
#endif // __REVISION_NR_H__ |
4135b24
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ProcDamageAndSpellFor there is need for special case handling Weapons of Maelstorm proc e.g. needs completely to be removed after casting one boosted spell
4135b24
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right, fixed in [8966]