Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New version of the VATS algorithm (Largest Dependency Set First) #115

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

sensssz
Copy link

@sensssz sensssz commented Dec 15, 2016

This pull request uses a new version of the VATS algorithm under version 5.7.

@grooverdan
Copy link

what is different about the new implementation?

@mysql-oca-bot
Copy link

Hi, thank you for your contribution. Please confirm this code is submitted under the terms of the OCA (Oracle's Contribution Agreement) you have previously signed by cutting and pasting the following text as a comment:
"I confirm the code being submitted is offered under the terms of the OCA, and that I am authorized to contribute it."
Thanks

@sensssz
Copy link
Author

sensssz commented Dec 15, 2016

Hi, Daniel. In this new implementation we look at the sub-tree of each lock instead of just looking at the arrival time in the system. This gives us a more accurate yet efficient enough way of deciding which transaction to schedule first.

@sensssz
Copy link
Author

sensssz commented Dec 15, 2016

I confirm the code being submitted is offered under the terms of the OCA, and that I am authorized to contribute it.

@grooverdan
Copy link

@sensssz , great, keep up the good work! 👍

@mysql-oca-bot
Copy link

Hi, thank you for your contribution. Your code has been assigned to an internal queue. Please follow
bug http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=84266 for updates.
Thanks

@sensssz sensssz changed the title New Implementation for Vats New version of the VATS algorithm Aug 1, 2017
@sensssz sensssz changed the title New version of the VATS algorithm New version of the VATS algorithm (Largest Dependency Set First) Aug 1, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants