Issues - nakajima/acts_as_fu

nakajima / acts_as_fu

Description:

When you need a dash of ActiveRecord and nothing more

Sort by: Priority | Votes | Last Updated

Loading…

1.

0 votes

pluralize or alias for build_model?
0 comments Created 5 months ago by dancroak

Title

Body
I bumped up against errors that didn't reveal much to me because I accidentally wrote build_model :user instead of build_model :users. To help future users of acts_as_fu, what do you think of these two approaches? require 'active_support/core_ext' and name.pluralize on line 25 (ActsAsFu::Connection.connection.create_table) or alias :build_table, :build_model ?
or cancel

I bumped up against errors that didn't reveal much to me because I accidentally wrote build_model :user instead of build_model :users.

To help future users of acts_as_fu, what do you think of these two approaches?

require 'active_support/core_ext' and name.pluralize on line 25 (ActsAsFu::Connection.connection.create_table)

or

alias :build_table, :build_model

?

Comments

Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown
2.

0 votes

Named scopes
2 comments Created 3 months ago by grimen

Title

Body
I can't get named scopes to work with act_as_fu. <pre> NoMethodError: undefined method... </pre> No matterif I declare them in the real model or within build_model block. Everything else works - even complex assocations. Any ideas?
or cancel
I can't get named scopes to work with act_as_fu.
```
NoMethodError: undefined method...
```
No matterif I declare them in the real model or within build_model block. Everything else works - even complex assocations. Any ideas?
Comments

nakajima Sat Sep 05 15:00:16 -0700 2009 | link

I can't seem to reproduce this: http://gist.github.com/181530

Can you paste the entire error message?

Comment
I can't seem to reproduce this: http://gist.github.com/181530 Can you paste the entire error message?
or cancel

grimen Sat Sep 05 23:14:04 -0700 2009 | link

Does this help?

http://gist.github.com/181666

The Review class gets defined as a subclass of ::IsReviewable::Review in runtime. Well only named scopes don't work, so it cannot be that right?

Comment
Does this help? http://gist.github.com/181666 The Review class gets defined as a subclass of ::IsReviewable::Review in runtime. Well only named scopes don't work, so it cannot be that right?
or cancel

Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown

Labels

▾
feature

pluralize or alias for build_model?

Comments

Named scopes

Comments