Skip to content
Continuous Integration

WIP: Additional Test Events for OneTimeSetUp / OneTimeTearDown #80

Sign in to view logs

WIP: Additional Test Events for OneTimeSetUp / OneTimeTearDown

WIP: Additional Test Events for OneTimeSetUp / OneTimeTearDown #80

Re-run triggered April 20, 2024 12:08
@OsirisTerjeOsirisTerje
#4652
TSAVogt:AdditionalTestEvents
Status Failure
Total duration 2m 41s
Artifacts –

NUnit.CI.yml

on: pull_request
Windows Build
2m 27s
Windows Build
Linux Build
1m 41s
Linux Build
MacOS Build
1m 9s
MacOS Build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

30 errors and 3 warnings
MacOS Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L65
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
MacOS Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L89
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
MacOS Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L116
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
MacOS Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L147
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
MacOS Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L171
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
MacOS Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L202
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
MacOS Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L227
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
MacOS Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L65
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
MacOS Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L89
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
MacOS Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L116
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Linux Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L65
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Linux Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L89
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Linux Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L116
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Linux Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L147
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Linux Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L171
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Linux Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L202
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Linux Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L227
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Linux Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L65
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Linux Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L116
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Linux Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L89
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Windows Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L65
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Windows Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L89
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Windows Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L171
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Windows Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L147
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Windows Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L202
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Windows Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L227
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Windows Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L116
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Windows Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L65
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Windows Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L89
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
Windows Build: src/NUnitFramework/tests/Internal/Execution/OneTimeSetUpTearDownEventTests.cs#L116
Consider using the constraint model, Assert.That(...), instead of the classic model, CollectionAssert(...) (https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers/tree/master/documentation/NUnit2049.md)
MacOS Build
No files were found with the provided path: test-results. No artifacts will be uploaded.
Linux Build
No files were found with the provided path: test-results. No artifacts will be uploaded.
Windows Build
No files were found with the provided path: test-results. No artifacts will be uploaded.