Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8332101: Add an @since to StandardOperation:REMOVE in jdk.dynalink #19189

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nizarbenalla
Copy link
Contributor

@nizarbenalla nizarbenalla commented May 11, 2024

Code cleanup, please review this simple change. I split my changes into 1 PR per module to make reviewing simpler.
To help with the review, this was added back in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8191905
TIA


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8332101: Add an @<!---->since to StandardOperation:REMOVE in jdk.dynalink (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19189/head:pull/19189
$ git checkout pull/19189

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19189
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19189/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19189

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19189

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19189.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 11, 2024

👋 Welcome back nizarbenalla! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 11, 2024

@nizarbenalla This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8332101: Add an `@since` to `StandardOperation:REMOVE` in `jdk.dynalink`

Reviewed-by: jpai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 102 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f398cd2: 8331575: C2: crash when ConvL2I is split thru phi at LongCountedLoop
  • 96c5c3f: 8329998: Remove double initialization for parts of small TypeArrays in ZObjArrayAllocator
  • ee4a9d3: 8321622: ClassFile.verify(byte[] bytes) throws unexpected ConstantPoolException, IAE
  • ab8d7b0: 8324517: C2: crash in compiled code because of dependency on removed range check CastIIs
  • fe8a2af: 8307778: com/sun/jdi/cds tests fail with jtreg's Virtual test thread factory
  • 95f79c6: 8332253: Linux arm32 build fails after 8292591
  • b687aa5: 8332176: Refactor ClassListParser::parse()
  • 4083255: 8316138: Add GlobalSign 2 TLS root certificates
  • 43b109b: 8330066: HeapDumpPath and HeapDumpGzipLevel VM options do not mention HeapDumpBeforeFullGC and HeapDumpAfterFullGC
  • 7cff04f: 8330276: Console methods with explicit Locale
  • ... and 92 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8af606fb8cdb3a6ecdfe4cddd79f228b64d5fc80...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@jaikiran) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 11, 2024

@nizarbenalla To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • build
  • client
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • graal
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • ide-support
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • kulla
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah

@nizarbenalla
Copy link
Contributor Author

I believe jdk.nashorn is under core-libs

/label core-libs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label May 11, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 11, 2024

@nizarbenalla
The core-libs label was successfully added.

@nizarbenalla nizarbenalla marked this pull request as ready for review May 12, 2024 18:53
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 12, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 12, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change looks good to me. StandardOperation.REMOVE was introduced through https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8191905 which was a JDK 10 change, so matches with the proposed change in this PR.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 16, 2024
@nizarbenalla
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label May 16, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 16, 2024

@nizarbenalla
Your change (at version 642b850) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 16, 2024

Going to push as commit f9f8d0b.
Since your change was applied there have been 102 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f398cd2: 8331575: C2: crash when ConvL2I is split thru phi at LongCountedLoop
  • 96c5c3f: 8329998: Remove double initialization for parts of small TypeArrays in ZObjArrayAllocator
  • ee4a9d3: 8321622: ClassFile.verify(byte[] bytes) throws unexpected ConstantPoolException, IAE
  • ab8d7b0: 8324517: C2: crash in compiled code because of dependency on removed range check CastIIs
  • fe8a2af: 8307778: com/sun/jdi/cds tests fail with jtreg's Virtual test thread factory
  • 95f79c6: 8332253: Linux arm32 build fails after 8292591
  • b687aa5: 8332176: Refactor ClassListParser::parse()
  • 4083255: 8316138: Add GlobalSign 2 TLS root certificates
  • 43b109b: 8330066: HeapDumpPath and HeapDumpGzipLevel VM options do not mention HeapDumpBeforeFullGC and HeapDumpAfterFullGC
  • 7cff04f: 8330276: Console methods with explicit Locale
  • ... and 92 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8af606fb8cdb3a6ecdfe4cddd79f228b64d5fc80...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels May 16, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 16, 2024

@jaikiran @nizarbenalla Pushed as commit f9f8d0b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants