Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Immigration #116

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Mar 14, 2014
Merged

Immigration #116

merged 3 commits into from Mar 14, 2014

Conversation

PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically generated by prose.io.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Mar 12, 2014

I like this. I am reading it in a positive light though; could it be read as "we'll take those who make us richer but not others"? Is there an unintentional subtext?

Also, I'd swap economy and society at the end of the first paragraph.

Not quite ready to vote, want to hear from others first, but I agree with the direction.

@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

fair point. It was intended to be read positively. I certainly didn't
intend for any subtext. What would you propose I remove the final paragraph?

On 12 March 2014 09:50, James Smith notifications@github.com wrote:

I like this. I am reading it in a positive light though; could it be read
as "we'll take those who make us richer but not others"? Is there an
unintentional subtext?

Also, I'd swap economy and society at the end of the first paragraph.

Not quite ready to vote, want to hear from others first, but I agree
with the direction.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/116#issuecomment-37390855
.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Mar 12, 2014

I'm sure you didn't, but this is an area where people will misread intentionally. I don't think I'd remove anything, but perhaps we should also mention our moral obligation to provide a haven for those being persecuted in their own countries, or something, so it's not just one-sided on the "best and brightest" side of things.

@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added an additional sentence to third paragraph, and an extra paragraph at
the end.

On 12 March 2014 09:59, James Smith notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm sure you didn't, but this is an area where people will misread
intentionally. I don't think I'd remove anything, but perhaps we should
also mention our moral obligation to provide a haven for those being
persecuted in their own countries, or something, so it's not just one-sided
on the "best and brightest" side of things.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/116#issuecomment-37391516
.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Mar 12, 2014

Nice. 👍

@philipjohn
Copy link
Member

👍 👍 👍 👍 :)

Floppy added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2014
@Floppy Floppy merged commit db01afe into openpolitics:gh-pages Mar 14, 2014
@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Feb 8, 2017

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote symbol type this points
Agree 👍 :thumbsup: 1
Abstain :hand: -1
Block 👎 :thumbsdown: -1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

If the proposer makes a change to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants