HoC approval for Cabinet appointments

[philipjohn]

This addresses my comment in #94

[PaulJRobinson]

Whilst I'm 👍 I don't see it as being strictly necessary given our Parliamentary system ensures the party in government will command a majority in HoC. It's more useful in systems with a separation of powers to ensure appropriate checks on the Executive - partlcularly when opposing parties control different arms. So I support this PR because I believe in the principle, but I don't think it's really needed.

Parliamentary approval of key positions at the top of the Civil Service though would be a very worthwhile idea.

[philipjohn]

"systems with a separation of powers to ensure appropriate checks on the Executive" watch this space... ;)

"Parliamentary approval of key positions at the top of the Civil Service though would be a very worthwhile idea." I'd support that!

[Floppy]

👍

[Floppy]

Agree on civil service stuff too, and I'm looking forward to seeing the separation of powers stuff :)

[Floppy]

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote	symbol	type this	points
Agree	👍	:thumbsup:	1
Abstain	✋	:hand:	-1
Block	👎	:thumbsdown:	-1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

If the proposer makes a change to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted.