Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[DNM] TEST #1864

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

[DNM] TEST #1864

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

swghosh
Copy link
Member

@swghosh swghosh commented Jan 25, 2024

This is a test PR, do not merge.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: swghosh
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign soltysh for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@swghosh swghosh changed the title [DNM] TEST: bump o/api,lib-go; ObjectValidator ctx; o-kas FeatureGates CFE-910: [DNM] TEST: bump o/api,lib-go; ObjectValidator ctx; o-kas FeatureGates Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 25, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci bot

@swghosh: This pull request references CFE-910 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

This is a test PR, do not merge.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@swghosh swghosh changed the title CFE-910: [DNM] TEST: bump o/api,lib-go; ObjectValidator ctx; o-kas FeatureGates [DNM] TEST: bump o/api,lib-go; ObjectValidator ctx; o-kas FeatureGates Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

This is a test PR, do not merge.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Jan 30, 2024

/test unit

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Jan 31, 2024

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Feb 6, 2024

/test unit

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Feb 6, 2024

/retest-required

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Feb 7, 2024

/test unit

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Feb 7, 2024

/payload 4.16 nightly blocking

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2024

@swghosh: trigger 8 job(s) of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.16

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.16-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.16-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.16-upgrade-from-stable-4.15-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.16-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.16-e2e-aws-ovn-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.16-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.16-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.16-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-bm

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/d323c9f0-c58e-11ee-962b-79ce59c3cb03-0

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@swghosh swghosh changed the title [DNM] TEST: bump o/api,lib-go; ObjectValidator ctx; o-kas FeatureGates [DNM] TEST Feb 8, 2024
@swghosh swghosh marked this pull request as draft February 8, 2024 11:12
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 8, 2024
@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Feb 8, 2024

/test unit

Thejas N and others added 3 commits February 12, 2024 16:59
@swghosh
UPSTREAM: <carry>: Add context to ObjectValidator
fe98fc7 
TODO: add router validation logic to implement ctx add in ObjectValidator

Co-authored-by: Swarup Ghosh <swghosh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Swarup Ghosh <swghosh@redhat.com>
@swghosh
UPSTREAM: <drop>: Bump deps for api and library-go
4dd5e93 
- hack/pin-dependecy.sh github.com/openshift/api ae973131190ee375747ac8efad4d4bc077d6c4fd
- hack/pin-dependency.sh github.com/openshift/library-go 126b47137408f93a2fc9f2e8cbeedda61f9ebbfb
- hack/update-vendor.sh

Signed-off-by: Swarup Ghosh <swghosh@redhat.com>
@swghosh
UPSTREAM: <carry>: Add openshift feature gates to kube-apiserver
5060f50 
Signed-off-by: Swarup Ghosh <swghosh@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@swghosh
UPSTREAM: <carry>: Add pkg/features/openshift_features.go
25c48be 
- injects openshift specific feature gates to kube binaries

Signed-off-by: Swarup Ghosh <swghosh@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Feb 28, 2024

/test all

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@swghosh
Syntactically better
4b9ce50 
Signed-off-by: Swarup Ghosh <swghosh@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@swghosh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Feb 28, 2024

/test all

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2024

@swghosh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips 4b9ce50 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
ci/prow/e2e-gcp 4b9ce50 link true /test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-crun 4b9ce50 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-crun
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2 4b9ce50 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-crun-wasm 4b9ce50 link true /test e2e-aws-crun-wasm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Mar 27, 2024

/close

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 27, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Mar 27, 2024
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 27, 2024

@swghosh: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

@soltysh soltysh Awaiting requested review from soltysh

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@swghosh @openshift-ci-robot @openshift-merge-robot