Merge pull request #351 from yozachar/workshop

feat: adds `base58` and `base64` validators

CHANGES.md

@@ -9,6 +9,25 @@ Note to self: Breaking changes must increment either
 
 -->
 
+## 0.26.0 (2024-04-02)
+
+_**Breaking**_
+
+> No breaking changes were introduced in this version.
+
+_**Features**_
+
+- feat: adds `base58` and `base64` validators by @yozachar in [#351](https://github.com/python-validators/validators/pull/351)
+
+_**Maintenance**_
+
+- fix: regex ignore-case uses only `a-z` by @yozachar in [#349](https://github.com/python-validators/validators/pull/349)
+- patch: supported extended latin in username by @yozachar in [#350](https://github.com/python-validators/validators/pull/350)
+
+**Full Changelog**: [`0.25.0...0.26.0`](https://github.com/python-validators/validators/compare/0.25.0...0.26.0)
+
+---
+
 ## 0.25.0 (2024-04-02)
 
 _**Breaking**_
@@ -24,7 +43,7 @@ _**Maintenance**_
 - maint: adds quick start docs by @yozachar in [#344](https://github.com/python-validators/validators/pull/344)
 - fix: `domain` validation is now more consistent across rfcs by @yozachar in [#347](https://github.com/python-validators/validators/pull/347)
 
-**Full Changelog**: [`0.24.2...0.25.0`](https://github.com/python-validators/validators/compare/0.23.2...0.24.0)
+**Full Changelog**: [`0.24.2...0.25.0`](https://github.com/python-validators/validators/compare/0.24.2...0.25.0)
 
 ---
 

SECURITY.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 | Version    | Supported          |
 | ---------- | ------------------ |
-| `>=0.25.0` | :white_check_mark: |
+| `>=0.26.0` | :white_check_mark: |
 
 ## Reporting a Vulnerability
 

docs/api/hashes.md

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 # hashes
 
+::: validators.hashes.base58
+::: validators.hashes.base64
 ::: validators.hashes.md5
 ::: validators.hashes.sha1
 ::: validators.hashes.sha224

docs/api/hashes.rst

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ hashes
 ------
 
 .. module:: validators.hashes
+.. autofunction:: base58
+.. autofunction:: base64
 .. autofunction:: md5
 .. autofunction:: sha1
 .. autofunction:: sha224

src/validators/__init__.py

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 from .cron import cron
 from .domain import domain
 from .email import email
-from .hashes import md5, sha1, sha224, sha256, sha512
+from .hashes import base58, base64, md5, sha1, sha224, sha256, sha512
 from .hostname import hostname
 from .i18n import es_cif, es_doi, es_nie, es_nif, fi_business_id, fi_ssn, fr_department, fr_ssn
 from .iban import iban
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@
     # ...
     "email",
     # hashes
+    "base58",
+    "base64",
     "md5",
     "sha1",
     "sha224",
@@ -82,4 +84,4 @@
     "validator",
 )
 
-__version__ = "0.25.0"
+__version__ = "0.26.0"

src/validators/hashes.py

@@ -7,6 +7,52 @@
 from .utils import validator
 
 
+@validator
+def base58(value: str, /):
+    """Return whether or not given value is a valid base58 hash.
+
+    Examples:
+        >>> base58('14pq6y9H2DLGahPsM4s7ugsNSD2uxpHsJx')
+        # Output: True
+        >>> base58('cUSECm5YzcXJwP')
+        # Output: ValidationError(func=base58, args={'value': 'cUSECm5YzcXJwP'})
+
+    Args:
+        value:
+            base58 string to validate.
+
+    Returns:
+        (Literal[True]): If `value` is a valid base58 hash.
+        (ValidationError): If `value` is an invalid base58 hash.
+    """
+    return re.match(r"^[1-9A-HJ-NP-Za-km-z]+$", value) if value else False
+
+
+@validator
+def base64(value: str, /):
+    """Return whether or not given value is a valid base64 hash.
+
+    Examples:
+        >>> base64('Y2hhcmFjdGVyIHNldA==')
+        # Output: True
+        >>> base64('cUSECm5YzcXJwP')
+        # Output: ValidationError(func=base64, args={'value': 'cUSECm5YzcXJwP'})
+
+    Args:
+        value:
+            base64 string to validate.
+
+    Returns:
+        (Literal[True]): If `value` is a valid base64 hash.
+        (ValidationError): If `value` is an invalid base64 hash.
+    """
+    return (
+        re.match(r"^(?:[A-Za-z0-9+/]{4})*(?:[A-Za-z0-9+/]{2}==|[A-Za-z0-9+/]{3}=)?$", value)
+        if value
+        else False
+    )
+
+
 @validator
 def md5(value: str, /):
     """Return whether or not given value is a valid MD5 hash.

tests/test_hashes.py

@@ -4,7 +4,54 @@
 import pytest
 
 # local
-from validators import ValidationError, md5, sha1, sha224, sha256, sha512
+from validators import ValidationError, base58, base64, md5, sha1, sha224, sha256, sha512
+
+# ==> base58 <== #
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "value",
+    [
+        "cUSECaVvAiV3srWbFRvVPzm5YzcXJwPSwZfE7veYPHoXmR9h6YMQ",
+        "18KToMF5ckjXBYt2HAj77qsG3GPeej3PZn",
+        "n4FFXRNNEW1aA2WPscSuzHTCjzjs4TVE2Z",
+        "38XzQ9dPGb1uqbZsjPtUajp7omy8aefjqj",
+    ],
+)
+def test_returns_true_on_valid_base58(value: str):
+    """Test returns true on valid base58."""
+    assert base58(value)
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "value",
+    ["ThisIsAReallyLongStringThatIsDefinitelyNotBase58Encoded", "abcABC!@#", "InvalidBase58!"],
+)
+def test_returns_failed_validation_on_invalid_base58(value: str):
+    """Test returns failed validation on invalid base58."""
+    assert isinstance(base58(value), ValidationError)
+
+
+# ==> base64 <== #
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "value",
+    ["SGVsbG8gV29ybGQ=", "U29tZSBkYXRhIHN0cmluZw==", "YW55IGNhcm5hbCBwbGVhcw=="],
+)
+def test_returns_true_on_valid_base64(value: str):
+    """Test returns true on valid base64."""
+    assert base64(value)
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "value",
+    ["SGVsbG8gV29ybGQ", "U29tZSBkYXRhIHN0cmluZw", "YW55IGNhcm5hbCBwbGVhc"],
+)
+def test_returns_failed_validation_on_invalid_base64(value: str):
+    """Test returns failed validation on invalid base64."""
+    assert isinstance(base64(value), ValidationError)
+
 
 # ==> md5 <== #