Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Anisotropic materials in RCWA calculations #48

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

phoebe-p
Copy link
Member

Allows the user to pass a dielectric tensor (actually, a "refractive index tensor" for consistency) at each wavelength, rather than simply a scalar refractice index, to the RCWA solver. This functionality already exists in S4, this simply allows the user to pass information through the RayFlare interface to S4. Addresses #47.

@phoebe-p
Copy link
Member Author

phoebe-p commented Apr 21, 2022

  • Add tests
  • Add functionality to RCWA for matrix method (currently only done for rcwa_structure)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 21, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #48 (f87451e) into devel (3fb1861) will increase coverage by 2.14%.
The diff coverage is 98.14%.

❗ Current head f87451e differs from pull request most recent head 90023b1. Consider uploading reports for the commit 90023b1 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel      #48      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.44%   93.58%   +2.14%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        2549     2542       -7     
==========================================
+ Hits         2331     2379      +48     
+ Misses        218      163      -55     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
rayflare/utilities.py 94.56% <96.55%> (+0.62%) ⬆️
rayflare/rigorous_coupled_wave_analysis/rcwa.py 93.22% <100.00%> (+8.62%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant