Issues - railsmachine/moonshine

railsmachine / moonshine

300

Description:

Rails deployment and configuration management done right. ShadowPuppet + Capistrano == crazy delicious

Sort by: Priority | Votes | Last Updated

Loading…

20.

0 votes

Can we get some more documentation (or even hints!) on how to create manifest for specific server roles?
0 comments Created 4 months ago by paulsingh

Title

Body
I've been banging my head against the wall for the last few hours tonight and simply can't figure out how to make different manifests apply to boxes in my web and db roles. In the current doc, there's a very small tip, "By default, Capistrano applies the manifest at app/manifests/application_manifest.rb. To run a different manifest, for example one to install and maintain packages on a server of a different role: set :moonshine_manifest, 'memcached_manifest'" Can we get a teaser or some other tips on how to make this work? I've been using Moonshine for months now and am now in a position where I absolutely need to separate out the DB from the Web role.
or cancel

I've been banging my head against the wall for the last few hours tonight and simply can't figure out how to make different manifests apply to boxes in my web and db roles. In the current doc, there's a very small tip, "By default, Capistrano applies the manifest at app/manifests/application_manifest.rb. To run a different manifest, for example one to install and maintain packages on a server of a different role: set :moonshine_manifest, 'memcached_manifest'"

Can we get a teaser or some other tips on how to make this work? I've been using Moonshine for months now and am now in a position where I absolutely need to separate out the DB from the Web role.

Comments

Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown
21.

0 votes

gem-deps
x

apt_gems in moonshine.yml do not override plugin's apt_gems.yml (supporting rmagick in 9.04)
3 comments Created 4 months ago by possiamo

Title

Body
Thank you for moonshine. It has been wonderful. We are deploying to Ubuntu 9.04. Everything worked fine until we added rmagick. The rmagick dependencies have changed. We added this to our moonshine.yml: <pre> :apt_gems: :rmagick: - imagemagick - libmagickcore-dev </pre> After commiting and 'cap deploy', the libmagickcore-dev library is not installed on our server. 1. Are we headed in the right direction? 2. Is some other step needed? 3. Is this a good way to handle the changed rmagick dependency?
or cancel
Thank you for moonshine. It has been wonderful.

We are deploying to Ubuntu 9.04. Everything worked fine until we added rmagick. The rmagick dependencies have changed.

We added this to our moonshine.yml:
```
:apt_gems:
  :rmagick:
    - imagemagick
    - libmagickcore-dev
```
After commiting and 'cap deploy', the libmagickcore-dev library is not installed on our server.
1. Are we headed in the right direction?
2. Is some other step needed?
3. Is this a good way to handle the changed rmagick dependency?
Comments

possiamo Thu Aug 13 09:37:27 -0700 2009 | link

Update: further investigation shows that imagemagick library was not installed. Either before or after we added the apt_gems entry to moonshine.yml. This is listed as a rmagick dependency in both entries. It looks like it isn't referencing either entry.

Do we have to do something other than add a config.gem entry, re-generate gems.yml, verify the rmagick entry, commit, and deploy?

Comment
Update: further investigation shows that imagemagick library was not installed. Either before or after we added the apt_gems entry to moonshine.yml. This is listed as a rmagick dependency in both entries. It looks like it isn't referencing either entry. Do we have to do something other than add a config.gem entry, re-generate gems.yml, verify the rmagick entry, commit, and deploy?
or cancel

mattscilipoti Thu Aug 20 12:17:08 -0700 2009 | link

There seems to be a little more activity in the google groups, so I started a discussion there:
http://groups.google.com/group/railsmachine-moonshine/browse_thread/thread/3e28d1e7b1c5d109

Comment
There seems to be a little more activity in the google groups, so I started a discussion there: http://groups.google.com/group/railsmachine-moonshine/browse_thread/thread/3e28d1e7b1c5d109
or cancel

mattscilipoti Fri Aug 28 07:07:04 -0700 2009 | link

We have confirmed that apt_gem entries in moonshine.yml do NOT override existing entries in the plugin's apt_gems.yml.

Comment
We have confirmed that apt_gem entries in moonshine.yml do NOT override existing entries in the plugin's apt_gems.yml.
or cancel

Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown
22.

0 votes

deploy:setup fails, because of the rubygems installation
3 comments Created 3 months ago by juhat

Title

Body
ruby lib version (1.8.7) doesn't match executable version (1.8.6)
or cancel

ruby lib version (1.8.7) doesn't match executable version (1.8.6)

Comments

jnewland Wed Aug 26 10:37:18 -0700 2009 | link

it looks like this server had ruby installed on it previously, and the attempt to remove it and re-install REE didn't work. can you send the output of dpkg -i | grep ruby?

Comment
it looks like this server had ruby installed on it previously, and the attempt to remove it and re-install REE didn't work. can you send the output of `dpkg -i | grep ruby`?
or cancel

juhat Thu Aug 27 14:46:43 -0700 2009 | link

Yes, You are right. It is a fresh Ec2 ubuntu 8.10 image, and it has these packages installed. But I dont see the reason, why the uninstall fails.
ii libopenssl-ruby
ii libopenssl-ruby1.8
ii libruby1.8
ii ruby
ii ruby1.8

Comment
Yes, You are right. It is a fresh Ec2 ubuntu 8.10 image, and it has these packages installed. But I dont see the reason, why the uninstall fails. ii libopenssl-ruby ii libopenssl-ruby1.8 ii libruby1.8 ii ruby ii ruby1.8
or cancel

juhat Thu Aug 27 15:17:31 -0700 2009 | link

It seems, that the lib...ruby... packages arent removed.
Maybe the ec2-ami-tools package the problem? It depends on ruby.

Comment
It seems, that the lib...ruby... packages arent removed. Maybe the ec2-ami-tools package the problem? It depends on ruby.
or cancel

Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown
25.

1 vote

compat
x

Ruby 1.9 Support
1 comment Created 1 day ago by john-griffin

Title

Body
I would really like to deploy my apps with Ruby 1.9 but there is currently no way of doing so that I can see. Thanks!
or cancel

I would really like to deploy my apps with Ruby 1.9 but there is currently no way of doing so that I can see.

Thanks!

Comments

ches Mon Dec 21 05:12:00 -0800 2009 | link

We've done some testing with 1.9 but so far not enough -- we'll certainly get there, but in the meantime we'll gladly accept patches ;-)

Comment
We've done some testing with 1.9 but so far not enough -- we'll certainly get there, but in the meantime we'll gladly accept patches ;-)
or cancel

Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown