New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Augment lm interval #908
Augment lm interval #908
Conversation
- Also fix coeficient plot example in documentation
Thank you so much @grantmcdermott! A few thoughts..
|
Yeah that sounds good to me. |
Okay, great. @grantmcdermott, whenever you get the chance, if you could make the change mentioned in the above comment and re |
Thanks gents, I'll try to get around to this later today. I'm a little reticent to set EDIT: Okay, I decided to go with |
- Avoids it getting taken up by methods that don't support an interval prediction argument (e.g. augment.loess)
@simonpcouch We'll see what the CI turn up. But running |
I totally see your point on the argument types—thanks for checking me there. The only remaining failure (besides the modeltests one) is just due to a need for one more |
This pull request has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue. |
Fixes #467 and #199
I haven't tested it thoroughly (will let CI do its magic and also build the docs) but looks good on my system. Reprex from the new doc examples:
Created on 2020-08-05 by the reprex package (v0.3.0)
Minor notes:
augment.lm()
docs and changed the coefficient plot example. (No ways this should be reflecting fit +/-se rather than the actual conf.low and conf.high bounds.)