Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust default confidence level and fix for glance.rqs #210

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

joranE
Copy link

@joranE joranE commented Mar 14, 2017

While attempting to answer this SO question, discovered that the default confidence levels differ from what you get from quantreg's summary methods. Also, needed to handle glance.rqs slightly differently rather than just recycle glance.rq.

Joran Elias and others added 5 commits March 14, 2017 14:54
…output from summary; also glance.rqs was broken, needed special case rather than just calling glance.rq
@alexpghayes
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @joranE sorry to take so long to get back to you. Thanks for contributing and catching the summary bug. We've made a couple recent changes to the quantreg tidiers (#206, #338). Are you interested in updating this PR and keeping in spirit with those recent changes?

If not I'll still switch over to summary.rq but will close this PR.

@joranE
Copy link
Author

joranE commented Jun 14, 2018

I probably don't have time to dive into this again in the near future, sorry.

@alexpghayes
Copy link
Collaborator

No problem! Glad to have the PR and bug fix anyways!

mkuehn10 added a commit to mkuehn10/broom that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2018
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 12, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants