New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
xe manpages #957
xe manpages #957
Conversation
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Thanks, the man pages look great! I have a minor question - I'm simply not sure of the protocol here, but what does the 'AUTHORS' section mean? Is it authorship of the manpage or of the tool it's describing? |
|
||
BUGS | ||
---- | ||
Send bugs to xen-devel@lists.xen.org, see http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs_against_XCP on how to send bug reports. General questions can be sent to xen-api@lists.xen.org. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bugs in xe/xapi are better sent to xen-api@lists.xen.org, not xen-devel. Xen-devel is more for hypervisor-level matter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Noted, we'll make the changes.
Also for Jon - This is from the manpage Howto.
"The AUTHOR section
...is nice to have in case there are gross errors in the documentation or program behaviour (Bzzt!) and you want to mail a bug report."
So it appears to be either/or. Perhaps we should specify. I want the manpage team to get credit but not undue credit.
Look good thanks! What do you want to do about installing these? At the moment this is just adding the man pages to the repository - are you intending to add them to the RPMs so they're present in dom0? |
Preferably they'd be distributed. On our side we have a script that creates manpages from the asciidoc source and we've created a SPEC file for the RPM itself. None of this is done though. When it's done we can share that too if there's interest. |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
1 similar comment
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
ok to test On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:30 PM, xen-git notifications@github.com wrote:
Dave Scott |
Apologies for the delay in merging - I think we had aspirations of doing some more autogeneration in this area, but it's not going to happen soon. Thanks very much for doing this work - we'd certainly be interested in the spec file changes to get these installed. |
Thanks Jon. We're upping our schedule to get more pages. Out we have a ton in the works but need to sign off on them internally before handing them over. Also we're working on moving our project more public so people can see what we're working on. I'll put the RPM generation back on front burner. |
Manpages for the following xe subcommands.
xe-pif-param-clear
xe-pif-param-get
xe-pif-param-list
xe-pif-param-remove
Let us know about syntax, formatting etc. on these 4. We 50 more in the pipe passing internal peer review.