Skip to content

[Do Not Merge] Test PR for v4.1.11 #137

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor

@NihalJain NihalJain changed the title Test PR for v4.1.11 [Do Not Merge] Test PR for v4.1.11 May 15, 2025
@Apache-HBase

This comment was marked as outdated.

@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Apache-HBase

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Apache-HBase

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Apache-HBase

This comment was marked as outdated.

@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure why the failure, passed locally, hence was able to upload. Will try again later!

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 48s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 markdownlint 0m 0s markdownlint was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-0 ⚠️ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ master Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 30s Maven dependency ordering for branch
-1 ❌ mvninstall 0m 17s root in master failed.
-1 ❌ compile 0m 17s root in master failed.
-1 ❌ compile 0m 18s hbase-shaded-protobuf in master failed.
-1 ❌ javadoc 0m 17s root in master failed.
-1 ❌ javadoc 0m 18s hbase-shaded-protobuf in master failed.
-0 ⚠️ patch 2m 31s Used diff version of patch file. Binary files and potentially other changes not applied. Please rebase and squash commits if necessary.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 31s Maven dependency ordering for patch
-1 ❌ mvninstall 0m 17s root in the patch failed.
-1 ❌ mvninstall 0m 17s hbase-shaded-protobuf in the patch failed.
-1 ❌ compile 0m 18s root in the patch failed.
-1 ❌ compile 0m 17s hbase-shaded-protobuf in the patch failed.
-1 ❌ javac 0m 18s root in the patch failed.
-1 ❌ javac 0m 17s hbase-shaded-protobuf in the patch failed.
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 xml 0m 1s The patch has no ill-formed XML file.
-1 ❌ javadoc 0m 17s root in the patch failed.
-1 ❌ javadoc 0m 18s hbase-shaded-protobuf in the patch failed.
_ Other Tests _
-1 ❌ unit 0m 17s root in the patch failed.
-1 ❌ unit 0m 17s hbase-shaded-protobuf in the patch failed.
+0 🆗 asflicense 0m 35s ASF License check generated no output?
6m 49s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #137
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit xml compile markdownlint
uname Linux 8f518ca43d77 5.4.0-1103-aws #111~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 23 20:04:10 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
git revision master / 6016e75
Default Java Temurin-1.8.0_452-b09
mvninstall https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/branch-mvninstall-root.txt
compile https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/branch-compile-root.txt
compile https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/branch-compile-hbase-shaded-protobuf.txt
javadoc https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/branch-javadoc-root.txt
javadoc https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/branch-javadoc-hbase-shaded-protobuf.txt
mvninstall https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/patch-mvninstall-root.txt
mvninstall https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/patch-mvninstall-hbase-shaded-protobuf.txt
compile https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/patch-compile-root.txt
compile https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/patch-compile-hbase-shaded-protobuf.txt
javac https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/patch-compile-root.txt
javac https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/patch-compile-hbase-shaded-protobuf.txt
javadoc https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/patch-javadoc-root.txt
javadoc https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/patch-javadoc-hbase-shaded-protobuf.txt
unit https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/patch-unit-root.txt
unit https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/patch-unit-hbase-shaded-protobuf.txt
Test Results https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 27 (vs. ulimit of 1000)
modules C: . hbase-shaded-protobuf U: .
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/5/console
versions git=2.43.0 maven=3.9.9
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Build passes with this change, refer apache/hbase#6993

@stoty
Copy link

stoty commented May 19, 2025

Do you know why the CI fails tht badly ?
Can you kick off another CI run ?

@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor Author

NihalJain commented May 19, 2025

Do you know why the CI fails tht badly ? Can you kick off another CI run ?

I tried several times, the failure report page does not even load or is empty. Triggered another one https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/6/console

Although build works fine locally. And hence was able to upload!

@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also re-triggered for #136 to see if this is a localised issue: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-136/10/console

@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Raised apache/hbase#7002 to test the patch on branch-2

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 1m 50s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 markdownlint 0m 0s markdownlint was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-0 ⚠️ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ master Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 19s Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 44s master passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 23s master passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 12s master passed
-0 ⚠️ patch 1m 47s Used diff version of patch file. Binary files and potentially other changes not applied. Please rebase and squash commits if necessary.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 8s Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 52s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 23s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 23s the patch passed
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 xml 0m 1s The patch has no ill-formed XML file.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 12s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 0m 10s hbase-shaded-protobuf in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 0m 44s root in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 10s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
6m 23s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/6/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #137
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit xml compile markdownlint
uname Linux 504eeba3d268 5.4.0-1103-aws #111~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 23 20:04:10 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
git revision master / 6016e75
Default Java Temurin-1.8.0_452-b09
Test Results https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/6/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 397 (vs. ulimit of 1000)
modules C: hbase-shaded-protobuf . U: .
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/6/console
versions git=2.43.0 maven=3.9.9
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do you know why the CI fails tht badly ? Can you kick off another CI run ?

I tried several times, the failure report page does not even load or is empty. Triggered another one https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-137/6/console

Although build works fine locally. And hence was able to upload!

So this time it passed here.

Also re-triggered for #136 to see if this is a localised issue: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Thirdparty-PreCommit/job/PR-136/10/console

While failed in #136, where it was passing before.

Not sure why we are seeing random failures for this project specifically.

@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure why we are seeing random failures for this project specifically.

Triggering build in DEBUG to find hints!

@NihalJain
Copy link
Contributor Author

NihalJain commented May 20, 2025

This temp PR is no longer needed as changes are now merged to master!

@NihalJain NihalJain closed this May 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants