Skip to content

[ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend PyBundledModule with extension.BundledModule #11595

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 12, 2025

Conversation

pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #11565 by @Gasoonjia
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/13/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/13/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/14/orig
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/13/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge

…block pybinding backend migration

Pull Request resolved: #11566

This diff creates different namespace for Module and BundledModule under different mode (aten or portable) to hacky solve the duplicated symbol issues in D73564127 since the their are too many complex dependency issues to solve, and lots of users are asking for pybinding backend migration.

In the future this impl should be replaced by shim-like layers.
ghstack-source-id: 289817083

Differential Revision: [D76405701](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76405701/)
…Module`

Pull Request resolved: #11565

# Context

This issue is a step of #9638.

In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`.

# Proposal

Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py
ghstack-source-id: 289817714
ghstack-source-id: 289817714
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 12, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11595

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 15 New Failures, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit d62f01f with merge base c4c4763 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 12, 2025
Base automatically changed from gh/gasoonjia/14/orig to main June 12, 2025 16:19
@JacobSzwejbka JacobSzwejbka merged commit b905975 into main Jun 12, 2025
79 of 95 checks passed
@JacobSzwejbka JacobSzwejbka deleted the gh/gasoonjia/13/orig branch June 12, 2025 16:52
@JacobSzwejbka
Copy link
Contributor

this is a bad pr that landed through internal flows. Theres a revert internally so im merging it here so that the revert can go through fine. Im not sure what happens if this never get merged and we only revert internally. It seems like it would likely cause a desync somewhere in the tooling

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants