-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 646
[ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend PyBundledModule
with extension.BundledModule
#11595
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…block pybinding backend migration Pull Request resolved: #11566 This diff creates different namespace for Module and BundledModule under different mode (aten or portable) to hacky solve the duplicated symbol issues in D73564127 since the their are too many complex dependency issues to solve, and lots of users are asking for pybinding backend migration. In the future this impl should be replaced by shim-like layers. ghstack-source-id: 289817083 Differential Revision: [D76405701](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76405701/)
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #11565 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 289817714 ghstack-source-id: 289817714 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11595
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 15 New Failures, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit d62f01f with merge base c4c4763 ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
this is a bad pr that landed through internal flows. Theres a revert internally so im merging it here so that the revert can go through fine. Im not sure what happens if this never get merged and we only revert internally. It seems like it would likely cause a desync somewhere in the tooling |
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #11565 by @Gasoonjia
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/13/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/13/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/14/orig
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/13/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge