Skip to content

New package: nomacs.nomacs.Beta version 3.21.1 #267618

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

SpecterShell
Copy link
Contributor

@SpecterShell SpecterShell commented Jun 23, 2025

Created by 🥟 Dumplings.

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Service Badge  Service Badge  

@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Validation Pipeline Run WinGetSvc-Validation-65-267618-20250623-1

@wingetbot wingetbot added New-Package Azure-Pipeline-Passed Validation pipeline passed. There may still be manual validation requirements. Validation-Completed Validation passed labels Jun 23, 2025
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 23, 2025 09:44
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Moderator-Approved One of the Moderators has reviewed and approved this PR label Jun 23, 2025
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot merged commit 2387667 into microsoft:master Jun 23, 2025
1 check passed
@spectopo spectopo deleted the nomacs.nomacs.Beta-3.21.1-227388179 branch June 23, 2025 11:06
@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Publish pipeline succeeded for this Pull Request. Once you refresh your index, this change should be present.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Azure-Pipeline-Passed Validation pipeline passed. There may still be manual validation requirements. Moderator-Approved One of the Moderators has reviewed and approved this PR New-Package Publish-Pipeline-Succeeded Validation-Completed Validation passed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants