-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Rewrite - Vulnerability Management for Maintainers #129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Rewrite - Vulnerability Management for Maintainers #129
Conversation
If Maintainers need assistance with how to handle a security vulnerability: | ||
|
||
1. For general guidance of a non sensitive nature, Contact the Security SIG | ||
through the #otel-sig-security channel in the Cloud Native Slack workspace. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
through the #otel-sig-security channel in the Cloud Native Slack workspace. | |
through the [#otel-sig-security](https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/C05A85QC281) channel in the CNCF Slack workspace. |
2. For sensitive guidance specific to an Advisory, reach out to Security SIG | ||
Maintainers as they have access to all Advisories and can comment directly in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2. For sensitive guidance specific to an Advisory, reach out to Security SIG | |
Maintainers as they have access to all Advisories and can comment directly in | |
2. For sensitive guidance specific to an Advisory, reach out to [Security SIG | |
Maintainers](https://github.com/open-telemetry/sig-security#maintainers) as they have access to all Advisories and can comment directly in |
1. **Direct Vulnerabilities**: Always request a CVE when a vulnerability exists | ||
in OTel's own code that could expose users to security risks. | ||
|
||
2. **Dependency Vulnerabilities**: Request a CVE if: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2. **Dependency Vulnerabilities**: Request a CVE if: | |
2. **Dependency Vulnerabilities**: Request a CVE if these are all true: |
|
||
Note that the vulnerability impact for the OTel executable may be different | ||
than for the dependency that caused it, depending on how it is used. Do not | ||
assume that the OTel CVE must have the same score as the dependency's CVE. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
- The vulnerability only affects consumers who explicitly import both the | ||
OTel library and the vulnerable dependency |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect that most dependencies are brought in transitively without explicit import
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also, similar bullets as above probably apply to libraries:
- The executable uses the vulnerable part of the dependency
- The vulnerability can be exploited through the executable's usage patterns
- The vulnerability creates a security impact for users of the executable
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we have a threshold (Medium or lower) for transitive dependencies that we don't even need to do the analysis for? (as long as we are rolling update into next monthly release)
vulnerability details before a fix is available. | ||
3. Only add Collaborators who are necessary for investigating or fixing the | ||
issue. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
vulnerability details before a fix is available. | |
3. Only add Collaborators who are necessary for investigating or fixing the | |
issue. | |
vulnerability details before a fix is available. | |
3. Only add Collaborators who are necessary for investigating or fixing the | |
issue. |
Second part of the updates to the Vulnerability Management documentation.
This is a rewrite of the policies around how maintainers should handle vulnerabilities to match both actual practices and bring consistency to them.