You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Have common extension functions that utilize the Encoder/Decoder abstraction
So a new encoder (not implemented by this library) can be utilized if library consumer creates it.
Optimization, because right now there is a lot of unnecessary array creation. Would be great if the
extension functions for the type (String, CharArray, ByteArray) were able to instantiate those types
off the bat and then input things as decoding/encoding occurs by converting the returned Byte.
Enable ability to have Encoder and Decoder classes which can be passed around
Enable ability to stream bytes/chars in or out, and receive encoded/decoded bytes on the other end
Encoder/Decoder configurations
Give people the ability to easily create their own Encoder/Decoders
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Add a base module (i.e.
encoding-core
) to:Encoder
/Decoder
abstractionextension functions for the type (
String
,CharArray
,ByteArray
) were able to instantiate those typesoff the bat and then input things as decoding/encoding occurs by converting the returned
Byte
.Encoder
andDecoder
classes which can be passed aroundEncoder
/Decoder
configurationsEncoder
/Decoder
sThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: