Fix enumeration gadgets with unique option #51
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Oh man, this is embarassing 🤦🏽♂️Thank you for root-causing and fixing this, will land this tonight / tag a new version 🙏🏽🙏🏽 Cheers |
0vercl0k
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When rp++ is run with the
--uniqueoption, only half of all gadgets are used and the rest are ignored.list_gadgets.extract()used in the for statement will remove the extracted element from the list_gadgets.Therefore,
list_gadgets.size()is decremented on each loop, and the for statement is only executedlist_gadgets.size()/2times.This PR fixes this issue.