Remove layouts section #179
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
**Why**: The layouts are overly prescriptive, may fall (or have fallen) out of alignment with current recommendations, and are not the most useful of resources for referencing appearance or markup of page sections (footer, navigation, etc). This removal should be complemented by future work to either: - Reference base components from USWDS for additional guidance - Document and list differences between USWDS footer / navigation and the login.gov Design System
juliaelman
requested changes
Jan 20, 2021
Yeah, it should be removed with the changes here: Are you still seeing it in the branch? |
|
Weird! It is gone now 🚀 |
juliaelman
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why: The layouts are overly prescriptive, may fall (or have fallen) out of alignment with current recommendations, and are not the most useful of resources for referencing appearance or markup of page sections (footer, navigation, etc).
This removal should be complemented by future work to either: