Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

исправление ошибки приведения типа #3221

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2024

Conversation

theshadowco
Copy link
Member

@theshadowco theshadowco commented Jan 11, 2024

Описание

Связанные задачи

Closes

Чеклист

Общие

  • Ветка PR обновлена из develop
  • Отладочные, закомментированные и прочие, не имеющие смысла участки кода удалены
  • Изменения покрыты тестами
  • Обязательные действия перед коммитом выполнены (запускал команду gradlew precommit)

Для диагностик

  • Описание диагностики заполнено для обоих языков (присутствуют файлы для обоих языков, для русского заполнено все подробно, перевод на английский можно опустить)

Дополнительно

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved the logic for tabular section handling to ensure accurate processing.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The update in the RefOveruseDiagnostic class enhances the robustness of the method responsible for retrieving tabular section names. By introducing a filter that checks if the elements are indeed instances of TabularSectionOwner before attempting a cast, the code now prevents potential ClassCastExceptions that could occur during runtime. This change is a defensive programming measure to ensure type safety.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../bsl/languageserver/diagnostics/RefOveruseDiagnostic.java Added a filter to check for TabularSectionOwner instances before casting in getTabularSectionNames method.

Poem

In the code where types do flow,
A rabbit placed a filter, so
Casts are safe, and bugs won't grow,
The code hops on, refined in glow. 🐇✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 11, 2024

👇 Click on the image for a new way to code review

Review these changes using an interactive CodeSee Map

Legend

CodeSee Map legend

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 086aad3 and 4313b07.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/com/github/_1c_syntax/bsl/languageserver/diagnostics/RefOveruseDiagnostic.java (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
src/main/java/com/github/_1c_syntax/bsl/languageserver/diagnostics/RefOveruseDiagnostic.java (1)
  • 251-251: The addition of a filter operation before casting to TabularSectionOwner is a good practice to avoid ClassCastException at runtime. This change ensures that only instances of TabularSectionOwner are processed, which aligns with the PR's objective to fix a type casting error.

Copy link

Qodana Community for JVM

17 new problems were found

Inspection name Severity Problems
Statement with empty body 🔶 Warning 5
'@Serial' annotation could be used 🔶 Warning 4
Constant values 🔶 Warning 3
Mismatched query and update of collection 🔶 Warning 2
Class is exposed outside of its visibility scope 🔶 Warning 1
Nullability and data flow problems 🔶 Warning 1
Mismatched read and write of array 🔶 Warning 1

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 11, 2024

@theshadowco theshadowco merged commit 08b00ab into develop Jan 12, 2024
33 checks passed
@theshadowco theshadowco deleted the feature/fixErr branch January 12, 2024 04:48
@nixel2007
Copy link
Member

@coderabbitai generate test

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2024

Based on the provided content of the RefOveruseDiagnostic class, the getTabularSectionNames method seems to be responsible for retrieving names of tabular sections from a given data source context. To generate a test, we would need to create a scenario where a SDBLParser.DataSourceContext is provided, and we verify that the method returns the correct list of tabular section names.

Here is a high-level outline of a test that could be written for the getTabularSectionNames method:

@Test
void testGetTabularSectionNames() {
  // Arrange: Create a mock DataSourceContext with the necessary properties to test the method.
  SDBLParser.DataSourceContext dataSourceContext = mock(SDBLParser.DataSourceContext.class);
  // ... set up dataSourceContext with the expected properties ...

  // Act: Call the getTabularSectionNames method with the mocked context.
  List<String> tabularSectionNames = refOveruseDiagnostic.getTabularSectionNames(dataSourceContext);

  // Assert: Verify that the returned list of names matches the expected result.
  assertThat(tabularSectionNames).containsExactlyInAnyOrder(/* expected tabular section names */);
}

This test would need to be fleshed out with the actual setup of the dataSourceContext to match the expected conditions for the test, and the expected tabular section names should be filled in based on those conditions.

@nixel2007, if you need a more detailed test case, please provide the specific conditions you'd like to test for, and I can help you craft the test accordingly.

Analysis chain
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the file that contains the `RefOveruseDiagnostic` class and read its contents to understand the changes made.
fd "RefOveruseDiagnostic.java" --exec cat {}

Length of output: 12788

Action performed

Review triggered.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants