Develop #1
Develop #1
Conversation
|
Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file |
|
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information |
![gitginie[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/712912?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in opening pull request.
Happy coding!
|
Thanks @2lambda123 for opening this PR! For COLLABORATOR only :
|
|
Processing PR updates... |
Their most recently public accepted PR is: 2lambda123/microsoft-windows-rs#1 |
|
First PR by @2lambda123 PR Details of @2lambda123 in Technus-TecTech :
|
WalkthroughThe recent updates focus on enhancing debug capabilities and code clarity within the project. New boolean flags have been introduced to control specific features of multi-block machinery in debug mode. Adjustments in variable declarations and method signatures aim to improve code consistency. Additionally, method modifications in elemental hatches and multi-block base logic refine the operation handling and data loading processes, aligning with the newly introduced debug controls. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
Description has been updated! |
PR summaryThe Pull Request introduces several changes to the TecTech mod, which seems to be an addon for the GregTech mod in Minecraft. The changes include:
SuggestionThe PR seems well-structured and the changes are clear. However, it would be beneficial to include unit tests to ensure that the new configuration options work as intended and do not introduce any regressions. Additionally, it's important to update any user documentation to reflect the new features and configuration options. Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect. Current plan usage: 23.75% Have feedback or need help? |
labels-and-badges
bot
added
NO JIRA
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in closing pull request.
Happy coding!
trafico-bot
bot
added
🔍 Ready for Review
![codereviewbot-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/309638?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| public static boolean DEBUG_MODE = false; | ||
| public static boolean POWERLESS_MODE = false; | ||
| public static boolean COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE = false; | ||
| public static boolean CERTAIN_MODE = false; | ||
| public boolean DISABLE_MATERIAL_LOADING_FFS; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The use of public static mutable fields for configuration flags is a significant security and design issue. Public static fields can be modified from anywhere in the application, leading to unpredictable behavior and making the application's state difficult to manage. This approach also violates the principle of encapsulation, one of the core tenets of object-oriented programming.
Recommended solution: Convert these public static fields into private fields with public getter methods. To set these fields, consider using a configuration management class or a static initialization block that reads from a configuration file or environment variables. This approach will make the application's configuration more secure, predictable, and maintainable.
| "Enables logging and other purely debug features"); | ||
| POWERLESS_MODE = _mainConfig.getBoolean("PowerlessMode", "debug", POWERLESS_MODE, | ||
| "Enables 0EU/t multi block machinery"); | ||
| COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE = _mainConfig.getBoolean("ComputationlessMode", "debug", COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE, | ||
| "Enables 0computation/s multi block machinery"); | ||
| CERTAIN_MODE = _mainConfig.getBoolean("CertainMode", "debug", CERTAIN_MODE, | ||
| "Enables certain multi block machinery"); | ||
| DISABLE_MATERIAL_LOADING_FFS = _mainConfig.getBoolean("DisableMaterialLoading", "debug", | ||
| DISABLE_MATERIAL_LOADING_FFS, "Set to true to disable gregtech material processing"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The configuration options are being set directly from the _mainConfig.getBoolean method without any validation or error handling. This approach can lead to issues if the configuration file is missing, corrupted, or if unexpected values are provided. It can result in the application starting in an inconsistent state or failing to start with a cryptic error message.
Recommended solution: Add validation and error handling around the configuration loading. Check if the configuration file exists and is accessible, validate the values obtained from the configuration (e.g., ensure they are within expected ranges), and provide clear error messages if any issues are encountered. This will improve the robustness and user-friendliness of the application's configuration management.
| try { | ||
| content = EMInstanceStackMap.fromNBT(TecTech.definitionsRegistry,aNBT.getCompoundTag("eM_Stacks")); | ||
| content = EMInstanceStackMap.fromNBT(TecTech.definitionsRegistry, aNBT.getCompoundTag("eM_Stacks")); | ||
| } catch (EMException e) { | ||
| if (DEBUG_MODE) { | ||
| e.printStackTrace(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The exception handling for loading NBT data is insufficient and could lead to silent failures in production environments. Currently, the exception is only printed to the standard error stream if DEBUG_MODE is true. This approach might miss critical issues during normal operation. It's recommended to improve error handling by logging the exception using a logging framework that can be configured to log errors appropriately based on the environment. Additionally, consider adding a fallback mechanism or a way to notify the system or user that loading has failed, ensuring that the failure does not go unnoticed.
| byte Tick = (byte) (aTick % 20); | ||
| if (DECAY_AT == Tick) { | ||
| purgeOverflow(); | ||
| content.tickContent(1, postEnergize,1);//Hatches don't life time mult things | ||
| content.tickContent(1, postEnergize, 1);//Hatches don't life time mult things | ||
| purgeOverflow(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The method tickContent is called within a conditional block that checks if the current tick matches DECAY_AT. This approach might introduce timing issues or inconsistencies in how content is updated, especially if tickContent has side effects or depends on being called at a specific frequency. It's recommended to review the logic to ensure that calling tickContent in this manner does not lead to unintended behavior. Consider whether the method needs to be called more consistently or if the condition needs to be adjusted to ensure reliable execution.
| if(CERTAIN_MODE){ | ||
| eCertainStatus=0; | ||
| }else{ | ||
| for (GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_Uncertainty uncertainty : eUncertainHatches) { | ||
| eCertainStatus = uncertainty.update(eCertainMode); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The loop iterating over eUncertainHatches and updating eCertainStatus with the result of uncertainty.update(eCertainMode) does not account for the possibility of different uncertainty objects returning different values. This means that eCertainStatus will only reflect the result of the last uncertainty.update(eCertainMode) call, potentially ignoring significant state changes indicated by other hatches. To address this, consider aggregating the results from all uncertainty.update(eCertainMode) calls in a way that reflects the overall state accurately, such as by using a boolean flag to indicate if any call returned a failure status.
| if (COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE || eRequiredData > eAvailableData) { | ||
| if (energyFlowOnRunningTick_EM(aStack, false)) { | ||
| stopMachine(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The method energyFlowOnRunningTick_EM is called with a hardcoded false parameter, which suggests that this method's behavior is not dynamic based on the current state or context. If the intention behind this design is to conditionally perform certain actions within energyFlowOnRunningTick_EM, it would be more maintainable and clear to handle such conditions inside the method itself or to pass a parameter that reflects the current state or needs. Consider refactoring to either move the condition inside the method or ensure that the parameter passed to energyFlowOnRunningTick_EM accurately represents the current context or state requirements.
trafico-bot
bot
added
✨ Merged
|
Check out the playback for this Pull Request here. |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @2lambda123 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
General suggestions:
- Ensure that the introduction of new modes and the abstraction of methods are well-documented for ease of understanding and maintenance.
- Review the changes to NBT data handling to prevent potential data loss or migration issues.
- Consider the impact of new configuration options on existing setups and ensure backward compatibility where necessary.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good
Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨
| @@ -93,10 +93,10 @@ public void loadNBTData(NBTTagCompound aNBT) { | |||
| super.loadNBTData(aNBT); | |||
| postEnergize = aNBT.getInteger("postEnergize"); | |||
| //lifeTimeMult=aNBT.getFloat("lifeTimeMult"); | |||
| overflowMatter = aNBT.getFloat("overflowMatter")+aNBT.getDouble("OverflowMatter"); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (bug_risk): Potential data loss when removing addition of float and double values.
Ensure that removing the addition of aNBT.getFloat("overflowMatter") and aNBT.getDouble("OverflowMatter") does not lead to data loss or unexpected behavior, especially if existing NBT data contains both keys.
| COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE = _mainConfig.getBoolean("ComputationlessMode", "debug", COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE, | ||
| "Enables 0computation/s multi block machinery"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code_refinement): Introduction of COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE and CERTAIN_MODE config options.
The addition of COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE and CERTAIN_MODE provides more flexibility for debugging and testing. Ensure documentation is updated to clearly explain these new modes to users.
trafico-bot
bot
added
🔍 Ready for Review
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (5)
- src/main/java/com/github/technus/tectech/loader/TecTechConfig.java (2 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/github/technus/tectech/thing/metaTileEntity/hatch/GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_ElementalContainer.java (5 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/github/technus/tectech/thing/metaTileEntity/hatch/GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_InputElemental.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/github/technus/tectech/thing/metaTileEntity/hatch/GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_OverflowElemental.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/github/technus/tectech/thing/metaTileEntity/multi/base/GT_MetaTileEntity_MultiblockBase_EM.java (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 12
src/main/java/com/github/technus/tectech/thing/metaTileEntity/hatch/GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_InputElemental.java (1)
- 27-30: The addition of an empty
moveAroundmethod inGT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_InputElementalclass raises questions about its purpose. If it's intended as a placeholder for future functionality or for subclasses to override, consider adding a comment explaining its intended use. Otherwise, if it's not expected to be overridden or implemented soon, it might be better to remove it to avoid confusion.src/main/java/com/github/technus/tectech/loader/TecTechConfig.java (1)
- 15-16: The addition of
COMPUTATIONLESS_MODEandCERTAIN_MODEflags to control specific features in debug mode is noted. Ensure that these flags are well-documented in the configuration file and their impact is clearly described. Additionally, verify that their usage throughout the codebase is consistent and aligns with the intended functionality.src/main/java/com/github/technus/tectech/thing/metaTileEntity/hatch/GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_OverflowElemental.java (1)
- 131-131: The modification in the
loadNBTDatamethod to directly setoverflowMatterfrom NBT data simplifies the loading process. This change is beneficial for clarity and potentially improves performance. However, please ensure that this change maintains backward compatibility with previously saved data, especially ifoverflowMatterwas previously stored in a different format or under different conditions.src/main/java/com/github/technus/tectech/thing/metaTileEntity/hatch/GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_ElementalContainer.java (4)
- 45-50: The adjustments to variable declarations and method signatures in
GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_ElementalContainerenhance clarity and consistency. However, please ensure that these changes are well-justified and do not introduce compatibility issues with existing code or data. It would be beneficial to document the rationale behind these changes, especially for significant type changes or renaming.- 96-99: The change in loading
overflowMatteras a double and the introduction ofcontentloading from NBT inloadNBTDatamethod are noted. Ensure that these changes are compatible with existing saved data and that they align with the intended precision and data handling requirements. It might be helpful to add comments explaining the choice of data types and any considerations for backward compatibility.- 116-116: The call to
content.tickContentwith hardcoded values suggests specific behavior for hatches. If these values are intended to be constants or derived from configuration, consider defining them explicitly or adding comments to clarify their significance and usage.- 249-249: The method
getInfoDatadynamically generates information based on thecontentandid. Ensure that the handling ofcontent.getElementalInfo()and the construction ofoutputarray are efficient and do not introduce unnecessary overhead, especially for large amounts of data. Consider optimizing the data retrieval and presentation logic if performance becomes a concern.src/main/java/com/github/technus/tectech/thing/metaTileEntity/multi/base/GT_MetaTileEntity_MultiblockBase_EM.java (5)
- 46-46: The import statements include static imports which could potentially make the code harder to read and maintain, especially for those unfamiliar with the codebase. Consider importing the classes directly and using their members with class references for clarity.
- 1057-1062: The conditional check for
CERTAIN_MODEdirectly affects theeCertainStatuswithout any additional logic or validation. Ensure that this behavior is intentional and documented, as it might not be immediately clear to other developers or future maintainers of the code.- 1100-1100: The
COMPUTATIONLESS_MODEcheck withinonRunningTickCheck_EMmethod could potentially skip important logic if the condition is met. It's crucial to ensure that this mode does not inadvertently bypass necessary operations that could affect the machine's state or performance.- 1057-1062: The handling of
CERTAIN_MODEandeCertainStatuswithin thehatchesStatusUpdate_EMmethod lacks error handling or validation. It's important to ensure that the state changes are valid and do not lead to unexpected behavior.- 1097-1103: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1100-1110]
The use of
COMPUTATIONLESS_MODEto bypass certain logic inonRunningTickCheck_EMandonRunningTickCheckmethods raises concerns about the potential for unintended side effects. It's advisable to thoroughly test these conditions to ensure they do not negatively impact the machine's functionality.
| @@ -1104,7 +1107,7 @@ public boolean onRunningTickCheck_EM(ItemStack aStack) { | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| public boolean onRunningTickCheck(ItemStack aStack) { | |||
| if (eRequiredData > eAvailableData) { | |||
| if (COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE || eRequiredData > eAvailableData) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Duplicate logic found in onRunningTickCheck method, similar to onRunningTickCheck_EM. Consider refactoring to avoid code duplication and ensure consistency in handling these checks across different methods.
- Consider merging the logic of `onRunningTickCheck` and `onRunningTickCheck_EM` to avoid duplication and maintain consistency.Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| if (COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE || eRequiredData > eAvailableData) { | |
| if (COMPUTATIONLESS_MODE || eRequiredData > eAvailableData) { |
Description
In this pull request, the following changes have been made:
Added new boolean fields in
TecTechConfig.java:COMPUTATIONLESS_MODECERTAIN_MODEUpdated the
GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_ElementalContainer.javafile:postEnergize,overflowMatter,id, anddeathDelay.loadNBTDatamethod to handle overflow matter loading.onPostTickmethod to handle content ticking.moveAroundmethod to be abstract.Updated the
GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_InputElemental.javafile:moveAroundmethod.Updated the
GT_MetaTileEntity_Hatch_OverflowElemental.javafile:loadNBTDatamethod.Minor code modifications in various files to include the newly added boolean flags.
These changes introduce new modes to the machinery system and improve handling and processing of certain elements and computational tasks.
Overall, the changes aim to enhance the functionality and behavior of the machinery system in the project.
Summary by CodeRabbit