[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate #81

pre-commit-ci · 2024-05-06T18:44:27Z

updates:

performance-testing-bot · 2024-05-06T18:44:32Z

Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file

cr-gpt · 2024-05-06T18:44:32Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-05-06T18:44:33Z

Processing PR updates...

git-greetings · 2024-05-06T18:44:33Z

Thanks @pre-commit-ci[bot] for opening this PR!

For COLLABORATOR only :

To add labels, comment on the issue
/label add label1,label2,label3
To remove labels, comment on the issue
/label remove label1,label2,label3

gitginie

@pre-commit-ci[bot]
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in opening pull request.
Happy coding!

git-greetings · 2024-05-06T18:44:36Z

PR Details of @pre-commit-ci[bot] in home-assistant-core :

OPEN	CLOSED	TOTAL
1	29	30

coderabbitai · 2024-05-06T18:44:36Z

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
- @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

cr-gpt · 2024-05-13T18:38:33Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-05-13T18:38:34Z

Processing PR updates...

cr-gpt · 2024-05-27T18:40:06Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-05-27T18:40:07Z

Processing PR updates...

cr-gpt · 2024-05-27T18:42:54Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-05-27T18:42:55Z

Processing PR updates...

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-05-27T18:43:12Z

homeassistant/components/renson/button.py

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@

 from __future__ import annotations

+from _collections_abc import Callable


The import from _collections_abc is not standard and might lead to compatibility issues across different Python versions. It's recommended to use collections.abc for importing Callable to ensure compatibility and maintainability.

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-05-27T18:43:12Z

homeassistant/components/renson/button.py

 from dataclasses import dataclass

-from _collections_abc import Callable
 from renson_endura_delta.renson import RensonVentilation


Directly importing and using a specific class (RensonVentilation) from an external library (renson_endura_delta.renson) within a component file can lead to tight coupling with the external library. It's advisable to abstract this interaction through a separate interface or module within the Home Assistant integration to improve modularity and ease future maintenance or updates to the external library.

cr-gpt · 2024-06-03T18:46:09Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-06-03T18:46:10Z

Processing PR updates...

cr-gpt · 2024-06-03T18:48:53Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-06-03T18:48:53Z

Processing PR updates...

cr-gpt · 2024-06-10T18:49:15Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-06-10T18:49:16Z

Processing PR updates...

cr-gpt · 2024-06-10T18:51:48Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-06-10T18:51:49Z

Processing PR updates...

cr-gpt · 2024-06-24T18:46:04Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-06-24T18:46:05Z

Processing PR updates...

cr-gpt · 2024-06-24T18:48:40Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-06-24T18:48:40Z

Processing PR updates...

cr-gpt · 2024-07-01T18:59:27Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-07-01T18:59:27Z

Processing PR updates...

cr-gpt · 2024-07-01T19:04:41Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-07-01T19:04:41Z

Processing PR updates...

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-07-01T19:05:56Z

tests/components/automation/test_init.py

    hass.bus.async_fire("test_event")
    await hass.async_block_till_done()
    assert len(calls) == 1
-    assert ["hello.world"] == calls[0].data.get(ATTR_ENTITY_ID)
+    assert calls[0].data.get(ATTR_ENTITY_ID) == ["hello.world"]


The test case does not include any error handling or assertions to verify that the event firing and subsequent actions complete successfully. If hass.bus.async_fire or hass.async_block_till_done fails, the test will not provide useful information about the failure.

Recommendation: Add error handling and assertions to ensure that hass.bus.async_fire and hass.async_block_till_done complete successfully before making assertions about calls.

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-07-01T19:05:56Z

tests/components/automation/test_init.py

    hass.bus.async_fire("test_event")
    await hass.async_block_till_done()
    assert len(calls) == 1
-    assert ["hello.world", "hello.world2"] == calls[0].data.get(ATTR_ENTITY_ID)
+    assert calls[0].data.get(ATTR_ENTITY_ID) == ["hello.world", "hello.world2"]


Similar to the previous issue, this test case lacks error handling or assertions to verify that the event firing and subsequent actions complete successfully. If hass.bus.async_fire or hass.async_block_till_done fails, the test will not provide useful information about the failure.

Recommendation: Add error handling and assertions to ensure that hass.bus.async_fire and hass.async_block_till_done complete successfully before making assertions about calls.

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-07-01T19:05:56Z

tests/components/automation/test_init.py

    await hass.async_block_till_done()

    assert len(calls) == 1
-    assert ["hello.world"] == calls[0].data.get(ATTR_ENTITY_ID)
+    assert calls[0].data.get(ATTR_ENTITY_ID) == ["hello.world"]


This test case also lacks error handling or assertions to verify that the event firing and subsequent actions complete successfully. If hass.async_block_till_done fails, the test will not provide useful information about the failure.

Recommendation: Add error handling and assertions to ensure that hass.async_block_till_done completes successfully before making assertions about calls.

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-07-01T19:05:56Z

tests/components/bayesian/test_binary_sensor.py

    hass.states.async_set("sensor.test_monitored1", "on")
    await hass.async_block_till_done()



The state change for sensor.test_monitored1 is set to "on" without verifying if this state is valid or expected in the context of the test. This could lead to false positives or negatives in the test results.

Recommended Solution:
Ensure that the state change to "on" for sensor.test_monitored1 is valid and expected within the context of the test. Add assertions or checks to validate the state before proceeding.

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-07-01T19:05:56Z

tests/components/demo/test_notify.py

    assert len(events) == 1
    data = events[0].data
-    assert {
+    assert data == {
        "message": "my message",
        "title": "my title",
        "data": {"hello": "world"},
-    } == data
+    }


The test does not handle the case where events might be empty, which would cause an IndexError when accessing events[0].data. This could lead to flaky tests if the event is not created as expected.

Recommended Solution: Add a check to ensure that events is not empty before accessing events[0].data.

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-07-01T19:05:57Z

tests/components/mqtt/test_init.py

    assert len(debug_info_data["entities"][0]["subscriptions"]) == 1
    assert len(debug_info_data["entities"][0]["subscriptions"][0]["messages"]) == 2


The assertions on lines 3343 and 3344 are directly accessing nested dictionary elements without checking if the keys exist. This can lead to KeyError exceptions if the structure of debug_info_data changes or if the expected keys are not present.

Recommended Solution: Add checks to ensure that the keys "entities", "subscriptions", and "messages" exist before accessing them. This will make the test more robust and prevent potential runtime errors.

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-07-01T19:05:57Z

tests/components/universal/test_media_player.py

    config_no_children = validate_config(config_no_children)
-    assert [] == config_no_children["children"]
+    assert config_no_children["children"] == []

    config_bad_children = validate_config(config_bad_children)
-    assert [] == config_bad_children["children"]
+    assert config_bad_children["children"] == []


The validate_config function calls are not awaited, which could lead to unexpected behavior if validate_config is an asynchronous function. This can cause the tests to pass incorrectly or fail intermittently.

Recommended Solution:
Ensure that validate_config is awaited if it is an asynchronous function. If it is not asynchronous, no changes are needed.

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-07-01T19:05:57Z

tests/helpers/test_entity_component.py

    assert mock_setup.called
-    assert ("platform_test", {}, {"msg": "discovery_info"}) == mock_setup.call_args[0]
+    assert mock_setup.call_args[0] == ("platform_test", {}, {"msg": "discovery_info"})


The assertion assert mock_setup.call_args[0] == ("platform_test", {}, {"msg": "discovery_info"}) is too strict and may lead to flaky tests if the order of arguments changes or if additional arguments are added. Consider using a more flexible assertion that checks for the presence of the expected arguments without enforcing their exact order.

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-07-01T19:05:57Z

tests/helpers/test_entity_component.py

+    assert sorted(
        ent.entity_id for ent in await component.async_extract_from_service(call)
-    )
+    ) == ["test_domain.test_1", "test_domain.test_2"]
    assert (
        "Not passing an entity ID to a service to target all entities is deprecated"
    ) not in caplog.text


The test is checking for the absence of a deprecation warning in the log, which is good. However, it would be more robust to explicitly clear the log before making the service call to ensure that no residual log messages from previous tests affect the outcome. Consider adding a step to clear the log before the service call.

codereviewbot-ai · 2024-07-01T19:05:57Z

tests/helpers/test_service.py

@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ async def test_split_entity_string(hass: HomeAssistant) -> None:
        },
    )
    await hass.async_block_till_done()
-    assert ["hello.world", "sensor.beer"] == calls[-1].data.get("entity_id")
+    assert calls[-1].data.get("entity_id") == ["hello.world", "sensor.beer"]


 async def test_not_mutate_input(hass: HomeAssistant) -> None:


The function test_not_mutate_input is defined but not implemented. This could lead to confusion or errors if the test suite is run expecting this test to perform some validation.

Recommended Solution:
Implement the test logic for test_not_mutate_input or remove the function if it is not needed.

updates: - [github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.4.2 → v0.5.1](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.4.2...v0.5.1) - [github.com/codespell-project/codespell: v2.2.6 → v2.3.0](codespell-project/codespell@v2.2.6...v2.3.0)

cr-gpt · 2024-07-08T18:35:06Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-07-08T18:35:07Z

Processing PR updates...

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

cr-gpt · 2024-07-08T18:37:18Z

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

code-companion-ai · 2024-07-08T18:37:18Z

Processing PR updates...

pep8speaks · 2024-07-08T18:37:34Z

Hello @pre-commit-ci[bot]! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

In the file tests/components/group/test_init.py:

Line 506:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)

In the file tests/helpers/test_entity_component.py:

Line 115:80: E501 line too long (86 > 79 characters)
Line 459:80: E501 line too long (85 > 79 characters)

pull-request-size bot added the size/XS label May 6, 2024

gitginie bot reviewed May 6, 2024

View reviewed changes

labels-and-badges bot added NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/XS Denotes a Pull Request that changes 0-9 lines. labels May 6, 2024

trafico-bot bot added the 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet label May 6, 2024

pre-commit-ci bot force-pushed the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch from 8a420ae to f02ee85 Compare May 13, 2024 18:38

pre-commit-ci bot force-pushed the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch from f02ee85 to 70e81c4 Compare May 27, 2024 18:40

codereviewbot-ai bot reviewed May 27, 2024

View reviewed changes

pre-commit-ci bot force-pushed the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch from 8588d60 to efd9873 Compare June 3, 2024 18:46

pre-commit-ci bot force-pushed the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch from 7da8c0d to 265aed4 Compare June 10, 2024 18:49

pre-commit-ci bot force-pushed the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch from e670f2e to b579e18 Compare July 1, 2024 18:59

pull-request-size bot removed the size/XS label Jul 1, 2024

labels-and-badges bot added PR:size/L Denotes a Pull Request that changes 100-499 lines. and removed PR:size/XS Denotes a Pull Request that changes 0-9 lines. labels Jul 1, 2024

pull-request-size bot added the size/L label Jul 1, 2024

codereviewbot-ai bot reviewed Jul 1, 2024

View reviewed changes

[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate

6dc37de

updates: - [github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.4.2 → v0.5.1](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.4.2...v0.5.1) - [github.com/codespell-project/codespell: v2.2.6 → v2.3.0](codespell-project/codespell@v2.2.6...v2.3.0)

pre-commit-ci bot force-pushed the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch from d10b4e2 to 6dc37de Compare July 8, 2024 18:35

pull-request-size bot removed the size/L label Jul 8, 2024

pull-request-size bot added the size/XS label Jul 8, 2024

labels-and-badges bot added PR:size/XS Denotes a Pull Request that changes 0-9 lines. and removed PR:size/L Denotes a Pull Request that changes 100-499 lines. labels Jul 8, 2024

[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

5d3de7d

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

pull-request-size bot added size/L and removed size/XS labels Jul 8, 2024

labels-and-badges bot added PR:size/L Denotes a Pull Request that changes 100-499 lines. and removed PR:size/XS Denotes a Pull Request that changes 0-9 lines. labels Jul 8, 2024

		@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@

		from __future__ import annotations

		from _collections_abc import Callable

		hass.states.async_set("sensor.test_monitored1", "on")
		await hass.async_block_till_done()

		assert len(debug_info_data["entities"][0]["subscriptions"]) == 1
		assert len(debug_info_data["entities"][0]["subscriptions"][0]["messages"]) == 2

[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate #81

Are you sure you want to change the base?

[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate #81

Conversation

pre-commit-ci bot commented May 6, 2024 • edited Loading

performance-testing-bot bot commented May 6, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented May 6, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented May 6, 2024

git-greetings bot commented May 6, 2024

gitginie bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

git-greetings bot commented May 6, 2024

coderabbitai bot commented May 6, 2024 • edited Loading

Review skipped

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

Documentation and Community

cr-gpt bot commented May 13, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented May 13, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented May 27, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented May 27, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented May 27, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented May 27, 2024

codereviewbot-ai bot May 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codereviewbot-ai bot May 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot commented Jun 3, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented Jun 3, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented Jun 3, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented Jun 3, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented Jun 10, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented Jun 10, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented Jun 10, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented Jun 10, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented Jun 24, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented Jun 24, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented Jun 24, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented Jun 24, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented Jul 1, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented Jul 1, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented Jul 1, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented Jul 1, 2024

codereviewbot-ai bot Jul 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codereviewbot-ai bot Jul 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codereviewbot-ai bot Jul 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codereviewbot-ai bot Jul 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codereviewbot-ai bot Jul 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codereviewbot-ai bot Jul 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codereviewbot-ai bot Jul 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codereviewbot-ai bot Jul 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codereviewbot-ai bot Jul 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codereviewbot-ai bot Jul 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot commented Jul 8, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented Jul 8, 2024

cr-gpt bot commented Jul 8, 2024

code-companion-ai bot commented Jul 8, 2024

pep8speaks commented Jul 8, 2024

pre-commit-ci bot commented May 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented May 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)