New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gost yescrypt may fail to build on some older versions of glibc. #4588
Comments
Ahhhh it's not crypt versions, it's that tw has xcrypt. |
Firstyear
added a commit
to Firstyear/389-ds-base
that referenced
this issue
Feb 2, 2021
Bug Description: If xcrypt is not available, especially on some distros with older libraries, 389 was unable to build. Fix Description: Detect if we have xcrypt, and if not, add stubs that always error instead. fixes: 389ds#4588 Author: William Brown <william@blackhats.net.au> Review by: @progier389, @jchapma, @droideck (Thanks!)
Firstyear
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 2, 2021
Bug Description: If xcrypt is not available, especially on some distros with older libraries, 389 was unable to build. Fix Description: Detect if we have xcrypt, and if not, add stubs that always error instead. fixes: #4588 Author: William Brown <william@blackhats.net.au> Review by: @progier389, @jchapma, @droideck (Thanks!)
Firstyear
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2021
Bug Description: If xcrypt is not available, especially on some distros with older libraries, 389 was unable to build. Fix Description: Detect if we have xcrypt, and if not, add stubs that always error instead. fixes: #4588 Author: William Brown <william@blackhats.net.au> Review by: @progier389, @jchapma, @droideck (Thanks!)
Firstyear
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2021
Bug Description: If xcrypt is not available, especially on some distros with older libraries, 389 was unable to build. Fix Description: Detect if we have xcrypt, and if not, add stubs that always error instead. fixes: #4588 Author: William Brown <william@blackhats.net.au> Review by: @progier389, @jchapma, @droideck (Thanks!)
Apparently I forgot to cherry pick this to the relevant branches :( better late than never. |
aadhikar
added a commit
to aadhikar/389-ds-base
that referenced
this issue
Aug 10, 2022
…f glibc Description: Fixed the test case for older version, also fixed another test case which had wrong attribute name: telephonenumber Relates: 389ds#4588 Reviewed by: @bsimonova (Thanks!)
bsimonova
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 10, 2022
…f glibc Description: Fixed the test case for older version, also fixed another test case which had wrong attribute name: telephonenumber Relates: #4588 Reviewed by: @bsimonova (Thanks!)
mreynolds389
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2022
…f glibc Description: Fixed the test case for older version, also fixed another test case which had wrong attribute name: telephonenumber Relates: #4588 Reviewed by: @bsimonova (Thanks!)
mreynolds389
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2022
…f glibc Description: Fixed the test case for older version, also fixed another test case which had wrong attribute name: telephonenumber Relates: #4588 Reviewed by: @bsimonova (Thanks!)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Issue Description
This appears to be due to missing defines in crypt.h on older glibc.
Package Version and Platform:
SLE 15.2 glibc-2.26-13.51.1.x86_64
does not affect SUSE TW glibc-2.32-4.1.x86_64
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: