Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 5701 - CLI - Fix referral mode setting #5708

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

droideck
Copy link
Member

Bug Description: Referral mode not working and failing with error: ERROR: Error: 103 - 10 - 53 - Server is unwilling to perform - [] - need to set nsslapd-referral It happens because in CLI, we set nsslapd-referral to the backend when it should be set to "cn=mapping tree".

Fix description: Set the attribute to the correct object. Add get_state and set_state custom functions to BackendSuffixView. Fix minor typos.

Fixes: #5701

Reviewed by: ?

Bug Description: Referral mode not working and failing with error: ERROR: Error:
103 - 10 - 53 - Server is unwilling to perform - [] - need to set nsslapd-referral
It happens because in CLI, we set nsslapd-referral to the backend when
it should be set to "cn=mapping tree".

Fix description: Set the attribute to the correct object.
Add get_state and set_state custom functions to BackendSuffixView.
Fix minor typos.

Fixes: 389ds#5701

Reviewed by: ?
Copy link
Contributor

@tbordaz tbordaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The overall patch looks good, just a question regarding replicated mapping tree.

try:
# Check if replication is enabled
replicas.get(suffix)
raise ValueError("Can not change the backend state of a replicated suffix")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am unsure to understand this restriction. If I have a consumer/hub, its mapping tree will eventually be 'referral on update'. With this test, will it be possible to set a consumer/hub mapping tree on 'referral on update' ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was added some time ago here by Mark:
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/blob/main/src/lib389/lib389/backend.py#L895
I got it from there to preserve the existing behaviour. :)

@mreynolds389 do you recall the reason for the check?
Is it adjusted automatically for consumer/hub mapping tree?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I recall it being a requirement. Does it cause any problems?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mreynolds389 , if it is called for a replicated backend with mt.set_state('referral on update') then it will raise the exception "Can not change the backend state of a replicated suffix". IIRC for a consumer/hub nsslapd-state needs to be 'referral on update' will it be done ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that the restriction is fine. There is no hard requirement but the replication plugin regularly resets that state trough repl_set_mtn_state_and_referrals, so allowing an user to set the mapping tree state on a replica is very tricky:
An administrator may think he set safely the backend in read-only mode
but replication may reset it to rw mode behind the scene ...

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Indeed the server itself may reset the state, mainly as referral if REPLICA_TYPE_READONLY and also during total update.
However I still have a doubt as this patch is about a CLI enhancement to allow an administrator to switch a backend/suffix into a referral (see 'Creating suffix referrals'). The is no documented restriction regarding replication.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Opps... my mistake. I realize I missed your point @progier389 . Setting referral/backend on a replicated suffix is useless because it will be reset. You are correct.
The procedure in admin guide should state that it does not apply on replicated suffix.
The patch is good. Ack

Copy link
Contributor

@tbordaz tbordaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanations. ACK

@droideck droideck merged commit ad0ec0c into 389ds:main Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Referral mode is not working
4 participants