Bs badges envs

[sbreiff]

• add biosample badge checks to data and staging
• remove tier1_metadata_missing badge check/action

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 91.566% when pulling 78597c4 on bs_badges_envs into 748287c on master.

[aschroed]

These changes look fine. One possible suggestion to think on that you can take or leave and a question that I am not sure of.
At line 197 in badge_checks.py you have '0' as the default passage_number if it's missing. I realize that the missing passage number warning will be generated but in this case where passage_number is missing for a stem cell perhaps a sterner specific warning is in order?

The question is that it looks like the Gold commendation check depends on the warnings check to have been run? Do we have any control on the order of check running - I think maybe that adding the warning check to the dependencies list of the commendation may do that but not sure exactly how that works - but is it not possible that some things may inappropriately get commended depending on the order they are run in?