Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enter: make log_timestamp date format universally compatible #1343

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 1, 2024

Conversation

JamiKettunen
Copy link
Contributor

@JamiKettunen JamiKettunen commented Apr 15, 2024

Tested as working on Chimera Linux with FreeBSD date(1) and Alpine Linux with busybox date(1) which both cannot report nanoseconds or timezone with : separator only supported on GNU coreutils which handles these extensions via a strftime() wrapper in gnulib.

Digging deeper in https://github.com/mirror/busybox/blob/master/coreutils/date.c technically busybox can support at least nanoseconds if the Alpine one was compiled with CONFIG_ENABLE_FEATURE_DATE_NANO=y, but it's not and %N is still not portable. Besides I can't think of a situation where reading log output would need sub-second accuracy so in my eyes this should be perfectly fine.

https://docs.podman.io/en/stable/markdown/podman-logs.1.html#since-timestamp lists some of the other supported formats, I basically picked one of the ISO 8601 options listed on https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/ while accounting for timezone offset by always dealing in UTC timestamps.

Tested as working on Chimera Linux with FreeBSD date(1) and Alpine Linux
with busybox date(1) which both cannot report nanoseconds or timezone
with ':' separator only supported on GNU coreutils which handles these
extensions via a strftime() wrapper in gnulib.
@89luca89
Copy link
Owner

89luca89 commented May 1, 2024

Thanks a lot for this! It is always good to have broader compatibiltiy :) thanks a lot!

@89luca89 89luca89 merged commit cbd55e5 into 89luca89:main May 1, 2024
22 checks passed
@JamiKettunen JamiKettunen deleted the portable-date branch May 1, 2024 19:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants