Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execution Block ID uid://A001/X15b4/Xc5 Sgr_A_st_i_updated_03_7M #191

Open
7 of 15 tasks
keflavich opened this issue Jul 31, 2022 · 7 comments
Open
7 of 15 tasks

Execution Block ID uid://A001/X15b4/Xc5 Sgr_A_st_i_updated_03_7M #191

keflavich opened this issue Jul 31, 2022 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
7m Delivered Done! EB Execution Block Needs Reimaging: Divergence Needs reimaging b/c of divergence NeedsImagingQAAfterReimaging Has been reimaged, but noone has looked at the results yet. Are they better? Reclean Needs to be or has been recleaned

Comments

@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor

keflavich commented Jul 31, 2022

Sgr_A_st_i_updated_03_7M
uid://A001/X15b4/Xc5

Product Links:

Reprocessed Product Links:

@keflavich keflavich added 7m EB Execution Block labels Jul 31, 2022
@xinglunju xinglunju self-assigned this Sep 7, 2022
@xinglunju
Copy link
Contributor

This is a re-observed SB after Vlsr shift. The original SB is at #37 and has been closed.

Calibration

No big issues.

Continuum imaging

The image looks good. The findcont results show 'OLD' and do not display plots, but based on the plots from step 38, continuum identification looks ok. This field covers Sgr B2, so the continuum identification can be improved a lot later.
image

Line imaging

  • spw24: Strong features in the 'line-free' mom8 map. Some lines could have been included in the line-free channels (around chan index~500). This also happens for spw16/18/20, and is a common problem for Sgr B2 fields.
    image
    image
  • spw26: slightly diverging, see below. Needs re-clean.
    image
  • spw20: except for the line-free channel issue, the line profile extends beyond the window even after the Vlsr shift, but perhaps this is the best we can do...
    image

Hipergator pipeline run line imaging

  • Only spw24 shows up in the weblog. The other images have errors like "Error in making PSF : One or more of the cube section failed in de/gridding" and do not exist in Globus. @keflavich could you take a look?

@xinglunju xinglunju added Reclean Needs to be or has been recleaned Needs Reimaging: Divergence Needs reimaging b/c of divergence labels Sep 19, 2022
@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Images are missing, as @xinglunju noted. Unclear why. All of the imaging scripts exist. In the imaging completeness grid, it shows up as incomplete

SB uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5:
    config.spw      field   image pbcor  psf   WIP  
----------------- --------- ----- ----- ----- ------
     7M.aggregate i_updated False False False  False
7M.aggregate_high i_updated False False False  False
         7M.spw16 i_updated False False False  False
         7M.spw18 i_updated False False  True WIPpsf
         7M.spw20 i_updated False False  True WIPpsf
         7M.spw22 i_updated False False False  False
         7M.spw24 i_updated  True  True  True   Done
         7M.spw26 i_updated False False False  False

There are junk cubes showing up:

$ ls -1d *spw16*cube*
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw16.cube.I.iter0.psf
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw16.cube.I.iter0.sumwt
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw16.cube.I.iter0.weight
$ ls -1d *spw18*cube*
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter0.pb
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter0.psf
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter0.residual
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter0.sumwt
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter0.weight
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter1.mask
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter1.model
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter1.pb
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter1.prev.mask
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter1.psf
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter1.residual
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter1.sumwt
uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw18.cube.I.iter1.weight

etc.

This field is being totally missed by the job runner. I'm digging.

@keflavich keflavich added the NeedsImagingQAAfterReimaging Has been reimaged, but noone has looked at the results yet. Are they better? label Feb 15, 2023
@xinglunju
Copy link
Contributor

Mar 1 2023 update: only the cube of SPW24 exists, cubes of the other SPWs do not exist on Globus. @keflavich

@xinglunju
Copy link
Contributor

xinglunju commented Apr 5, 2023

Not running - likely problem. Missing spw 16, 18, 20, 22, 26. @keflavich

@xinglunju
Copy link
Contributor

The SPW22 cube may have the stippling issue, similar to the 12m array data toward the same field (#138)

Screenshot_2023-10-17_11-01-07
Screenshot_2023-10-17_11-01-34

The SPW26 cube still has divergence:
Screenshot_2023-10-17_11-04-15

Other cubes look good.

@xinglunju
Copy link
Contributor

Cubes of SPW22 and SPW26 look good after increasing cyclefactor, no divergence is spotted.
@keflavich Uploading cubes of the two SPWs and relevant scripts to globus: /upload/Sgr_A_st_i_updated_03_7M_reclean/
Updated tclean parameters in PR #394
Setting this one as done.

@d-l-walker
Copy link
Contributor

@keflavich I'm re-running the feathering for the new statconted cubes, and I found this one was breaking due to the HNCO SPW having multiple beams (~/member.uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5/calibrated/working/uid___A001_X15b4_Xc5.s38_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw22.cube.I.iter1.image.pbcor.statcont.contsub.fits)

I've added some code to catch these instances on my end and smooth to a common beam, but just a heads up so you can fix it on your end too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
7m Delivered Done! EB Execution Block Needs Reimaging: Divergence Needs reimaging b/c of divergence NeedsImagingQAAfterReimaging Has been reimaged, but noone has looked at the results yet. Are they better? Reclean Needs to be or has been recleaned
Projects
Status: Completed execution blocks (imaging, QA, calibration all done)
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants