[libafl_qemu] fix i386 Regs values #444
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The `Regs` enum was defined out of order, leading to incorrect results from `emu.read_reg`. I found the correct ordering defined here: https://github.com/AFLplusplus/qemu-libafl-bridge/blob/master/target/i386/cpu.h#L46-L54
|
Thanks :) |
|
You're the first one to use that mode I assume 😁 |
|
Yeah, I believe so! It's all good, you've been so responsive to my PRs. Glad to give back and help libafl get more robust! |
khang06
pushed a commit
to khang06/LibAFL
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2022
The `Regs` enum was defined out of order, leading to incorrect results from `emu.read_reg`. I found the correct ordering defined here: https://github.com/AFLplusplus/qemu-libafl-bridge/blob/master/target/i386/cpu.h#L46-L54
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
Regsenum was defined out of order, leading to incorrect results fromemu.read_regfor i386. I found the correct ordering defined here.