The name of volcano point hazard category

[samnawi]

Problem

If we run the volcano point analysis, the name of hazard category is presented as the numeric format. I think it's not good and possibly make the user confuse.

Proposed Solution

make it more nice, like 3 km, 5 km, or radius 3 km, 5km, or something like that.
@Charlotte-Morgan and @fredychandra may be you can give some advices about it.

CC

@timlinux

Thank you.

[fredychandra]

Hi @samnawi @Charlotte-Morgan @timlinux @ismailsunni @lucernae

The heading of the table text in Hazard Category should change to make it relevance with the content. The content actually say about radius (distances) from center of volcano (eruption point) that might affect [people; building; road; crops].

I think the heading of the table result analysis can be change into Hazard Buffer and the unit should appear like @samnawi suggestion.

Thank you,

[Charlotte-Morgan]

I think the reason it says category is because it uses a categorical IF and the results try to relate to the words the user would have put into the analysis -
I would like to review all volcano related terminology together - rather than fix just one at a time

[ismailsunni]

Fixed in #2544 (add radius)