Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
51 lines (37 loc) · 2.86 KB

1_ProblemStatementExplanation.md

File metadata and controls

51 lines (37 loc) · 2.86 KB
Raw

📝 Dining Philosopher Problem

🌐 Problem Introduction

  • A classic synchronization problem often discussed after the producer-consumer problem.
  • A setup where philosophers (representing threads) compete for resources, which are spoons.

🖼️ Description

  • Five philosophers sit around a cake.
  • There are 5 spoons, one between each pair of philosophers.
  • A philosopher can eat the cake only when he has both the left and right spoons.

📜 Problem Constraints

  1. A philosopher can eat only if he has both left and right spoons.
  2. Philosophers first try to get the left spoon, then the right.
  3. If a philosopher gets the left spoon but the right is unavailable, he must release the left spoon and wait for 1 second before retrying.
  4. Upon getting both spoons, a philosopher eats for 1 second.
  5. After eating, the philosopher releases both spoons.
  6. The philosopher will wait for another second before trying for the next slice of cake.

🎯 Solution Approach

  • Philosophers are threads.
  • Spoons are resources.
  • Aim: Design a solution where all philosopher threads run in an infinite loop, ensuring non-adjacent philosophers can eat in parallel.

💡 Key Insights

  • Thread synchronization is one of the most challenging topics in CS.
  • Like mathematics, it requires significant practice.
  • Careful planning of data structures and program structure is essential.

🎤 Interview Questions on Dining Philosopher Problem

1. What is the primary challenge of the Dining Philosopher Problem?

  • Answer: Ensuring that all philosopher threads run in an infinite loop without leading to deadlock, while also making sure that non-adjacent philosophers can eat in parallel.

2. Why do philosophers attempt to acquire the left spoon before the right?

  • Answer: It's a constraint of the problem to standardize the sequence of acquiring resources and avoid circular wait conditions, which could potentially cause deadlocks.

3. How can two adjacent philosophers eating at the same time lead to a problem?

  • Answer: If two adjacent philosophers eat simultaneously, they'll be competing for the same spoon (resource), causing one of them to wait indefinitely, leading to potential deadlocks.

4. Why is there a 1-second gap after a philosopher releases the spoons before trying for the next slice of cake?

  • Answer: This constraint ensures that after releasing the resources, there's a delay before the same philosopher tries to acquire them again, allowing other philosophers a chance to acquire the resources.

5. How is the Dining Philosopher Problem relevant to real-world multi-threading problems?

  • Answer: The problem demonstrates the challenges in resource allocation among several competing entities or threads, showing the potential issues of deadlocks and the importance of careful resource scheduling.