Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove nanostack border router from examples list #13891

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2020
Merged

Remove nanostack border router from examples list #13891

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2020

Conversation

adbridge
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of changes

nanostack border router is now owned by ISG and has been moved out of ARMmbed and into their organisation. ISG will be
responsible for updating and testing this example going forward.

Impact of changes

nanostack-border-router example will no longer be tested in the mbed-os CI and will not automatically have
its mbed-os version updated whenever a release of mbed-os is made.

Migration actions required

None

Documentation

No updates required


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[x] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


nanostack border router is now owned by ISG and has been moved
out of ARMmbed and into their organisation. ISG will be
responsible for updating and testing this example going forward.
@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Nov 10, 2020
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from a team November 10, 2020 12:30
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@adbridge, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-tools @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Nov 11, 2020
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Nov 11, 2020

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Nov 11, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_dynamic-memory-usage ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit a937a43 into master Nov 12, 2020
@0xc0170 0xc0170 deleted the examples branch November 12, 2020 08:50
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Nov 12, 2020
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.5.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Nov 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants