Auto update list

[ChooJiaXin]

closes #104

Will add test cases in v1.4/after @hyngkng is done changing all addresss book to ProductiveNus

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #144 into master will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 40.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #144      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     51.95%   51.90%   -0.05%     
- Complexity      559      561       +2     
============================================
  Files           113      114       +1     
  Lines          2458     2487      +29     
  Branches        301      302       +1     
============================================
+ Hits           1277     1291      +14     
- Misses         1099     1113      +14     
- Partials         82       83       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
src/main/java/seedu/address/model/AddressBook.java	69.14% <35.00%> (-9.52%)	23.00 <1.00> (+1.00)	⬇️
.../java/seedu/address/model/task/UniqueTaskList.java	35.29% <60.00%> (ø)	7.00 <3.00> (ø)
...eedu/address/logic/parser/DeleteCommandParser.java	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)	2.00% <0.00%> (-2.00%)
...eedu/address/logic/parser/RemindCommandParser.java	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)	2.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
...ava/seedu/address/logic/commands/CommandLogic.java	84.61% <0.00%> (ø)	9.00% <0.00%> (?%)
...va/seedu/address/logic/commands/RemindCommand.java	87.87% <0.00%> (+2.16%)	10.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
...in/java/seedu/address/logic/parser/ParserUtil.java	74.00% <0.00%> (+2.57%)	15.00% <0.00%> (+2.00%)
...va/seedu/address/logic/commands/DeleteCommand.java	100.00% <0.00%> (+7.14%)	7.00% <0.00%> (-8.00%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8751dc7...3aacdec. Read the comment docs.

[andreatanky]

LGTM!

[hyngkng]

LGTM! I was at first worried about nested loops but figured there isn't a much better way anyways

[ChooJiaXin]

LGTM! I was at first worried about nested loops but figured there isn't a much better way anyways

I refactored the code so that the nesting isn't that bad and made the code neater :)