Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Branch docs developer guide #88

Merged

Conversation

ruilingk
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ruilingk ruilingk added this to the v1.3 milestone Oct 19, 2020
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #88 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #88   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     75.23%   75.23%           
  Complexity      463      463           
=========================================
  Files            75       75           
  Lines          1389     1389           
  Branches        138      138           
=========================================
  Hits           1045     1045           
  Misses          310      310           
  Partials         34       34           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9d96133...8863230. Read the comment docs.

@ruilingk ruilingk linked an issue Oct 19, 2020 that may be closed by this pull request
### \[Proposed\] Undo/redo feature

#### Proposed Implementation

The proposed undo/redo mechanism is facilitated by `VersionedAddressBook`. It extends `AddressBook` with an undo/redo history, stored internally as an `addressBookStateList` and `currentStatePointer`. Additionally, it implements the following operations:
The proposed undo/redo mechanism is facilitated by `VersionedAddressBook`. It extends `AddressBook` with an undo/redo

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should these be changed to VersionedTr4cker too?

Copy link

@cwenling cwenling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@cwenling cwenling merged commit 04f052d into AY2021S1-CS2103T-T10-2:master Oct 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update Developer Guide - PLANNER feature
3 participants