Update DG

[hogantan]

Add (Diagrams):

• ExamCommandClassDiagram
  

• ExamStatsActivityDiagram
  

• ExamStatsSequenceDiagram
  

• ToggleStudentCardSequenceDiagram
  

Add (DG details):

• Help command details
• Toggle command details
• Delete command details
• Add Exam command details
• Delete Exam command details
• Exam Stats command details
• User Stories
• Use Cases

Add (Misc):

• exam_stats_icon

Update:
UG structure
DG structure and details

[ong-yinggao98]

The activity diagrams might be too complex, perhaps we should split some up using the rake symbol. It seems that this guy here made a rake symbol that you can define in style.puml
https://forum.plantuml.net/195/is-there-any-support-for-subactivity-or-the-rake-symbol
After you do so I will have to do it too :(

Also, you could number your figures after the section
(e.g the third diagram in section 7.8.2 could be named fig 7.8.2.3)

[hogantan]

The activity diagrams might be too complex, perhaps we should split some up using the rake symbol. It seems that this guy here made a rake symbol that you can define in style.puml

Do you mean the sequence diagrams or the activity diagrams?

[ong-yinggao98]

The activity diagrams might be too complex, perhaps we should split some up using the rake symbol. It seems that this guy here made a rake symbol that you can define in style.puml

Do you mean the sequence diagrams or the activity diagrams?

Oh now that I look at it it's not your activity diagrams but @VaishakAnand and mine >:(
Nvm

[AlexCQY]

lgtm

[ong-yinggao98]

Could you number your figures before I merge?

[hogantan]

Could you number your figures before I merge?

Do you think the numbering convention of following the table contents could get quite messy? (e.g. Figure 6.8.1.1a )

Should we follow the traditional style instead? (Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.)

[ong-yinggao98]

Should we follow the traditional style instead? (Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.)

Hmmm I guess aight