Draft. Bug fixes on daemon, build probs and slowness

[willwade]

No description provided.

[willwade]

For #72 #71 #75 #63

[willwade]

@joedevsys feel free to try this if you get a chance.

[willwade]

Download of compiled binary and installer here: https://acecentreuk.sharepoint.com/:u:/s/AnonymousShares/EQOWTu5bMbNJn5R91_jos-8BZhGAN8ItWXA-_rsDGsmxdw?e=xna6hq

@f1andrew working on

• Deleting devices - singly or all
• Any tweaks for improvement anywhere else!

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.28%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	19.71 😞	19.66 😞	-0.05 👍
Method Length	90.07 🙂	89.10 🙂	-0.97 👍
Working memory	10.20 😞	10.16 😞	-0.04 👍
Quality	51.38% 🙂	51.66% 🙂	0.28% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	2044	2080	36

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
blehid.py	74.26% 🙂	74.26% 🙂	0.00%
relaykeys-cli.py	41.79% 😞	41.79% 😞	0.00%
relaykeys-qt.py	54.59% 🙂	54.98% 🙂	0.39% 👍
relaykeysd.py	43.49% 😞	43.94% 😞	0.45% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
relaykeys-cli.py	do_main	99 ⛔	525 ⛔	18 ⛔	6.10% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
relaykeysd.py	process_action	32 😞	332 ⛔	17 ⛔	17.50% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
relaykeysd.py	rpc_server_worker	41 ⛔	425 ⛔	12 😞	19.05% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
relaykeys-qt.py	Window.client_send_actions	36 ⛔	206 ⛔	17 ⛔	21.54% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
relaykeys-qt.py	Window.onKeyboardDown	35 ⛔	207 ⛔	15 😞	23.96% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!