New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Custom filter subscriptions (add by URL) #13
Comments
#12 could be enhanced by this issue's implementation including a "Submit for review to add to public directory" or some such.… ☺ |
There's a difference between #12 and this one. We serve all popular filter subscriptions (like EasyList and such) from our server: This version of EasyList is transformed a bit to be 100% compatible with Adguard. We also validate every change to EasyList and fix some errors automatically. One more bonus from this is that we don't need to download whole filter to check if it has changed. |
I understand they're different. I'm saying that URLs submitted via this mechanism could benefit #12 if there's a checkbox (default off, probably, & with comment field → maybe a beta APK feature?) to submit URL to AdGuard devs to review for inclusion in later releases. |
Now I got it, thank you! Looks too complicated to me. Maybe simpler solution? We can add a comment like this: |
That's, of course, simpler, but much less likely to produce results. Given volume of URLs custom-added & then submitted should be very low, submissions should be high-enough quality that the complication be worth the effort.… |
Depends on what result do we want. Normally we proxify & transform only known subscriptions which are currently supported. |
Just for clarification, will this include HOSTS file too ? |
Nope, hosts will be supported as part of the "DNS" module. |
Even online |
@TPS I don't mean we won't do it:) What I am saying is that hosts-files integration should be implemented as a part of the DNS module of AG as hosts might be used not just for blocking something, but for redirection or for enforcing safe search in some search engines. |
You mean you will add it in the DNS section of the app ? |
Yeah. And they'll be used as real hosts file, not just as a list of domains to block. |
Then will the "Simplified Domain Names Filter" subscription be moved here, as well? |
Nope, it is different. This is a "filter" with filtering rules syntax support, and not a list of domains. |
Then its blurb (from AGDNS repo, no less) confuses me mightily:
P.S.: "Description," of course! |
The good thing about AG DNS is that it understands basic rules syntax. Regarding the "simplified" part: some of the unsupported modifiers are stripped, it blocks only ad servers and does not contain rules which are not applicable (cosmetic, js, rules that block |
This seems to be the most important, basic issue... |
I would like to subscribe to NoCoin if AdGuard has this feature. |
Won't happen before v3.0. |
Just a note for @AdguardTeam's sanity: Don't forget the disclaimer, "We don't support any sort of shenanigan that anything you add may do to your AG instance, device, or yourself. You have been warned! Take it up with the filter maintainer, & don't forgot about Or whatever that does the same job. The mega-metalist from #1818 (comment) gave me a distinct sinking feeling of impending doom! 😱 |
Good idea, thank you! |
#13 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: