You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recently completed my first GtkAda application, and I'm delighted with it, but I had to give up on making sense of the documentation, because:
The only examples I've seen in the examples seem to have been retained unchanged from Gtk's C examples. Even someone familiar with C would have difficulty making sense of them, because GtkAda has a different interface than Gtk: many similarly-named functions act differently, and some C functions don't appear in the Ada version, and vice versa.
Some functions are documented incorrectly. For instance, the Next function on a Tree_Iter is said to return True or False, but it returns a pointer instead, and the apparent (and apparently undocumented) design is to compare to Null_Iter. (I might be remembering the name wrong.)
It would be OK to submit patches to change this, correct? If so, I'll do this in reference to this issue. I just want to make sure there wasn't a deliberate decision to retain this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I recently completed my first GtkAda application, and I'm delighted with it, but I had to give up on making sense of the documentation, because:
Next
function on aTree_Iter
is said to returnTrue
orFalse
, but it returns a pointer instead, and the apparent (and apparently undocumented) design is to compare toNull_Iter
. (I might be remembering the name wrong.)It would be OK to submit patches to change this, correct? If so, I'll do this in reference to this issue. I just want to make sure there wasn't a deliberate decision to retain this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: