Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using a different file extension #1

Closed
chris-morgan opened this issue Sep 19, 2013 · 10 comments
Closed

Consider using a different file extension #1

chris-morgan opened this issue Sep 19, 2013 · 10 comments

Comments

@chris-morgan
Copy link

.rs is used by Rust; it'd be good if the file extension for RedScript were changed to something else.

@AdamBrodzinski
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for bringing this to my attention! I didn't realize rust was using it. Being that .red is also being used, i'm going to leave this issue open until we can think of a better one. I'm open to any suggestions. Also the current state of the compiler is a complete hack so if anyone wants to write a proper one we will definitely change the name then.

@dancrew32
Copy link

proposing .rouge

@lion-man44
Copy link

proposing .rose

@ChrisAntaki
Copy link
Contributor

proposing rds

@dancrew32
Copy link

+1 @ChrisAntaki, probably safe to say no one is using .rds.

RDS files are 3D Image Files primarily associated with ERMIS Radio Data System haha

@AdamBrodzinski
Copy link
Owner

I like .rds. I really dislike having the long .coffee extension, so the shorter the better! 😄

@Davidslv
Copy link

👍 for .rds

Seems it will not conflict with anything.. I guess

@lion-man44
Copy link

.rds is good. 👍

@AdamBrodzinski
Copy link
Owner

Cool, let's roll with .rds. I'll try to update it this weekend. I'm starting up a new company so i've been pretty busy lately... hoping to also clean up some of the codebase and docs too.

@AdamBrodzinski
Copy link
Owner

Closing, using rds

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants